New Civic compared to Fit
#1
New Civic compared to Fit
7/17/06 Google Alert
Civic needs the Honda Fit’s paddle shifters:
http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/magazines/Business/html/20060715T190000-0500_109213_OBS_HONDA_S__TH_GENERATION_CIVIC_IS_AL L_GROWN_UP_.asp
Civic needs the Honda Fit’s paddle shifters:
http://www.jamaicaobserver.com/magazines/Business/html/20060715T190000-0500_109213_OBS_HONDA_S__TH_GENERATION_CIVIC_IS_AL L_GROWN_UP_.asp
#7
Because Honda is afraid that CVT won't sell as people won't feel that surge like they would in a 5-speed MT/AT, and would think that the car is slow. The concern is that the perceived performance is higher with the 5-speed MT/AT than the CVT.
I personally would love to buy the CVT version if it's available here, oh well, too bad.
I personally would love to buy the CVT version if it's available here, oh well, too bad.
#9
Originally Posted by bani
some expensive performance sports cars are now selling with CVT. hell, every honda civic hybrid is CVT now, as are all toyota priuses.
It's also important to know that Prius's CVT is not a true CVT, it uses planetary gears, but in a configuration that creates variable gear ratios between engine and wheel speeds (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toyota_Hybrid_System).
Ford's new conventional cars (five-hundred and freestyle) uses CVT along with 3 liter engines, so that might change some perceptions, if it sells well.
Last edited by dancingsun; 07-19-2006 at 10:37 AM.
#12
Originally Posted by cdnrsx
not a fan of CVT. That is the one thing that will keep me out of a Prius or Civic hybrid. They both need a five speed option.
Though in theory, CVT can be much more efficient than both conventional geared transmissions (AT and MT). It's able to fix the engine's rpm across variable speeds. That means, for maximum acceleration, you can fix the engine revolution at the spot where it generates its peak torque as your speed increases. Plus it doesn't use a torque converter, so it's much more efficient at transfering energy to the wheels than your conventional AT.
The catch is, you'll experience a slight delay until full acceleration kicks in as the engine revs up to the ideal rpm. And as your speed increases, your engine hums at a constant tone, creating an auditory illusion that you're not accelerating at all. The car also won't jerk (well, after the initial one), as there's no gears to switch into, so it feels a bit too smooth to be accelerating hard for those that are used to the conventional transmissions.
Those that own a CVT Fit, rest assured that you guys are getting better technology than we are.
Here's a good place to see how CVT works:
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/cvt.htm
This page shows the performance of CVT vs MT:
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/framed...rformances.htm
Last edited by dancingsun; 07-19-2006 at 01:50 PM.
#13
Originally Posted by dancingsun
The car also won't jerk (well, after the initial one), as there's no gears to switch into, so it feels a bit too smooth to be accelerating hard for those that are used to the conventional transmissions.
and a CVT can still accelerate like stink. it only annoys those punk riceboy racers who can't get their head around the fact that revs != acceleration.
#14
Ok ya, CVT is way better than your conventional automatic. It is just some feel more connected to the driving experience with a manual. There is still a place and a market for the CVT, I just hope they don’t stop making manuals
#16
A Civic with i-SHIFT in the UK has paddle shifters. I wish they were in the USA.
http://www.honda.co.uk/front.html?se...altransmission
http://www.honda.co.uk/front.html?se...altransmission
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Zerg
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
39
12-10-2010 02:29 AM