Off Topic Discussion Discuss anything that pleases you here.

Show me your camera gear!!!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #281  
Old 12-07-2008 | 10:39 PM
Arisenfury's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,398
From: CT
Might be time for some new kicks!
 
  #282  
Old 12-07-2008 | 10:41 PM
Darkstars's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 546
From: Chicago
I love those shoes. I bought these shoes back in 99-00 or so and I have a long history with them. They have been to multiple countries with me, they have worked multiple jobs with me, they have been to a few different schools with me, I've used them for everything from floor hockey to sure footing while cleaning frozen leaves out the snow covered gutters at the end of fall.... hell I even used them as work boots for over 2 years. Hell I've ripped the sole off and glued it back on....

They're still good for a couple more years, now days they only use use doing work around the house and things that involve lots of walking (hiking, things along those lines).
 
  #283  
Old 12-07-2008 | 10:42 PM
Darkstars's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 546
From: Chicago
btw would you believe those are the original laces still going strong
 
  #284  
Old 12-07-2008 | 11:36 PM
Arisenfury's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,398
From: CT
Damn, gotta give it up to Adidas. Laces are the first to go on my work shoes.
 
  #285  
Old 12-08-2008 | 02:42 AM
azncarbos's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (70)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,405
From: Santa Ana/Newport Beach, California
Originally Posted by Arisenfury
Went out with the new 70-200 f/2.8 during our first snow here in CT, I'm lovin' this thing.






Good to hear you are enjoying the new Lens!!!!! Great shots too!!!
Originally Posted by Darkstars
Sony A700 w/ Sony 1.4/50 lens, I still can't get over how sharp this lens is....

My favorite shoes shot at f4

The beauty with Primes Lens!!!

Sick shot man !!!

And dam!!!!
 
  #286  
Old 12-08-2008 | 03:44 PM
Chawee's Avatar
"Youngest FitFreak"(without a Fit)
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 1,222
From: Miami, Florida
Originally Posted by Arisenfury
For the money it can be had for now-a-days it can't be beat, however if you already like photography and you foresee yourself liking it even more you may find the D40 and even the D60 limiting after a short while, this could go for most of the entry level bodies as well though.
Why is it limiting? What the problem is with my Canon is that I have to develop the pictures to see the differences between different f-stops and its hard playing around with the little details when you can't see the result right then and there. I went to Best Buy and I saw the Nikon D40 and it looked nice, but I couldn't see anything in too much detail. Do you have maximum manual control or is it a pretty point and shoot. If I had a digital camera, I would get into it. I was also pretty happy (and disappointed) with the price, although $500 is steep. Remeber I don't want to get into proffesional photography, but I want to get good at it.

Oh yeah, while I'm here, if there Nikon D40 is just a point and shoot and isn't recommended, what is another good camera that is similar to the D40 price-wise. Or just tell me that the D40 is all I need. Thanks everyone.
 

Last edited by Chawee; 12-08-2008 at 03:48 PM.
  #287  
Old 12-08-2008 | 04:22 PM
azncarbos's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (70)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,405
From: Santa Ana/Newport Beach, California
Originally Posted by C-Fit
Why is it limiting? What the problem is with my Canon is that I have to develop the pictures to see the differences between different f-stops and its hard playing around with the little details when you can't see the result right then and there. I went to Best Buy and I saw the Nikon D40 and it looked nice, but I couldn't see anything in too much detail. Do you have maximum manual control or is it a pretty point and shoot. If I had a digital camera, I would get into it. I was also pretty happy (and disappointed) with the price, although $500 is steep. Remeber I don't want to get into proffesional photography, but I want to get good at it.

Oh yeah, while I'm here, if there Nikon D40 is just a point and shoot and isn't recommended, what is another good camera that is similar to the D40 price-wise. Or just tell me that the D40 is all I need. Thanks everyone.
What I think the limiting factors are the range of lens you can use, the controls you have available to you comparing to other SDLR...if you know how to control and set your setting ( which you do from film shooting) I would recommend getting a D60, D70, and D80 or XSI, XTI, and XS. If you do some research around you can pick a whole kit for cheap...look through nikon or canon forums and there will guy selling their ears for cheap! Hope that help!
 
  #288  
Old 12-08-2008 | 05:48 PM
CBX's Avatar
CBX
Member
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 984
From: Northern Arizona
Hey C-Fit, I don't remember whether I posted this here, but a site I find helpful is
Steve's Digicams - Camera Reviews

It should help you learn what differentiates the various models.
 
  #289  
Old 12-08-2008 | 06:13 PM
Arisenfury's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,398
From: CT
Originally Posted by C-Fit
Why is it limiting? What the problem is with my Canon is that I have to develop the pictures to see the differences between different f-stops and its hard playing around with the little details when you can't see the result right then and there. I went to Best Buy and I saw the Nikon D40 and it looked nice, but I couldn't see anything in too much detail. Do you have maximum manual control or is it a pretty point and shoot. If I had a digital camera, I would get into it. I was also pretty happy (and disappointed) with the price, although $500 is steep. Remeber I don't want to get into proffesional photography, but I want to get good at it.

Oh yeah, while I'm here, if there Nikon D40 is just a point and shoot and isn't recommended, what is another good camera that is similar to the D40 price-wise. Or just tell me that the D40 is all I need. Thanks everyone.
Don't get me wrong, the D40 is a great camera and was my first DSLR. However it can only autofocus with Nikkor AF-S and AF-I lenses, or Sigma HSM and Tamron IF lenses. While pretty much every new Nikkor lens is AF-S, if you ever want to save money and use older lenses, or use Nikkor prime lenses aside from the new AF-S 50mm, you'll have to manually focus them. In addition, D40 does not do commander mode for Nikon CLS wireless flashes, not a huge problem unless you plan on doing some easy off-camera lighting. Also there is really no buttons on the back of the camera so to change settings you'll have to sort through some menus. Compared to something around the D80-90 range where you have buttons for basic controls, and the D300+ which has a button for pretty much every control so you can change settings on the fly. It's a DSLR with kind of point and shoot simplicity on the outside but you can easily take full control over it should you want to. However for the price they are new, the value on them is kinda shot in the used market. You might be able to find a used one for a steal. I traded a D50 for a D40 for a few weeks and sold it online for about $200 body-only to get a D60 instead before going up to a D90. I sold my D60 for ~$300 body-only.
 
  #290  
Old 12-08-2008 | 09:57 PM
Darkstars's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 546
From: Chicago
Sony 70-300 SSM G Lens on my A700... I'm happy with the results, after almost removing this guy from the face of the earth with my Fit LOL








 
  #291  
Old 12-08-2008 | 10:01 PM
Fitcapo's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,257
From: Pleasant Prairie, Wisconsin
... you mean girl....

Pretty nice pics.


.... I really need to get out there and start just taking pics again.
 
  #292  
Old 12-08-2008 | 10:15 PM
Arisenfury's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,398
From: CT
Get a new lens, that always gets me taking pictures again lol
 
  #293  
Old 12-09-2008 | 12:57 AM
azncarbos's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (70)
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 5,405
From: Santa Ana/Newport Beach, California
Originally Posted by Darkstars
Sony 70-300 SSM G Lens on my A700... I'm happy with the results, after almost removing this guy from the face of the earth with my Fit LOL









Beautiful Photo man!!

Someone had a lil road rage!!

I would prefer shooting it and then skin it and BBQ the meat and use the skin to keep me warm during the winter!! hahahaha j/k
Originally Posted by Fitcapo
... you mean girl....

Pretty nice pics.


.... I really need to get out there and start just taking pics again.
True it Female!

Do it!!! It really fun! I promise!

Originally Posted by Arisenfury
Get a new lens, that always gets me taking pictures again lol
hahaha also must cost a lot too!
 
  #294  
Old 12-09-2008 | 07:23 AM
Fitcapo's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,257
From: Pleasant Prairie, Wisconsin
i can't afford a new lens right this moment i just bought a brand new mac book.
 
  #295  
Old 12-09-2008 | 09:06 AM
Arisenfury's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,398
From: CT
Then I guess you'll have to force yourself .
 
  #296  
Old 12-09-2008 | 05:58 PM
Fitcapo's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,257
From: Pleasant Prairie, Wisconsin
I would love to get a fish eye or like a straight 50mm.

Ohh by the way this is on my brand new mac book
 
  #297  
Old 12-09-2008 | 06:19 PM
Darkstars's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 546
From: Chicago
Thanks


and I was just ready some interesting info....


Originally Posted by Administator on a photography forum
From Rob Galbraith's site-

"The Nikon D3X’s 24.5-megapixel FX-format (35.9 x 24.0mm) CMOS sensor was developed expressly for the D3X in accordance with Nikon’s stringent engineering requirements and performance standards, with final production executed by Sony...."

More here:
Rob Galbraith DPI: Nikon acknowledges Sony connection in D3X image sensor

Now this makes for interesting news in my opinion. We knew that Sony was manufacturing sensors for Nikon in APS-C at least, but this is the first I have heard of Sony making a custom sensor for Nikon in the top end pro camera segment.

Since the D3x won't sell in huge numbers even with a price drop, this only goes to show Sony's dominating sensory technology division and it's manufacturing capabilities.
 
  #298  
Old 12-09-2008 | 06:47 PM
Darkstars's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 546
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by Arisenfury
Don't get me wrong, the D40 is a great camera and was my first DSLR. However it can only autofocus with Nikkor AF-S and AF-I lenses, or Sigma HSM and Tamron IF lenses. While pretty much every new Nikkor lens is AF-S, if you ever want to save money and use older lenses, or use Nikkor prime lenses aside from the new AF-S 50mm, you'll have to manually focus them. In addition, D40 does not do commander mode for Nikon CLS wireless flashes, not a huge problem unless you plan on doing some easy off-camera lighting. Also there is really no buttons on the back of the camera so to change settings you'll have to sort through some menus. Compared to something around the D80-90 range where you have buttons for basic controls, and the D300+ which has a button for pretty much every control so you can change settings on the fly. It's a DSLR with kind of point and shoot simplicity on the outside but you can easily take full control over it should you want to. However for the price they are new, the value on them is kinda shot in the used market. You might be able to find a used one for a steal. I traded a D50 for a D40 for a few weeks and sold it online for about $200 body-only to get a D60 instead before going up to a D90. I sold my D60 for ~$300 body-only.


Does this all apply to the D40X as well or just the D40? Whats the difference in the 2 and whats your take on the D60?
 
  #299  
Old 12-09-2008 | 06:49 PM
Fitcapo's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 2,257
From: Pleasant Prairie, Wisconsin
Correct me if I am wrong but I think the d40x is a point and shoot.

I would say if your looking at a d60 why not just upgrade straight to the new d90.
 
  #300  
Old 12-09-2008 | 07:14 PM
Darkstars's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 546
From: Chicago
I'm not looking to upgrade anytime soon, the camera I have now is direct competition of the D300 and EOS 40D... any upgrade from here is gonna cost a ton LOL.

I'm just not real familiar with Nikon products, that's why I ask the difference in the D40 and D40X, as for the D60... one of my good friends picked up a D60 w/ 2 lens and a bag on a black friday special, I'm just interested in what he picked up.
 


Quick Reply: Show me your camera gear!!!!



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:32 AM.