Deceiving Fuel Gauge?
#1
Deceiving Fuel Gauge?
I'd been noticing that the fuel gauge on my fit was non linear. For the first quarter tank I can put 100 miles on the car consistently. With this in mind you would think I could get 400 miles out of this car on one tank full.
Wrong.
I average 280 miles per tank full. That's me waiting for the 'idiot' light to light up. Over the last 3 fill ups, I've come up with this chart that shows how many miles I get out of this car at 1/4 tank, 1/2 tank, 3/4 tank and that last 1/4 tank...
Here what I came up with.
I'd never noticed that in any other car, and found it a little interesting, it must be the position of the float, I guess?
Wrong.
I average 280 miles per tank full. That's me waiting for the 'idiot' light to light up. Over the last 3 fill ups, I've come up with this chart that shows how many miles I get out of this car at 1/4 tank, 1/2 tank, 3/4 tank and that last 1/4 tank...
Here what I came up with.
I'd never noticed that in any other car, and found it a little interesting, it must be the position of the float, I guess?
#2
Originally Posted by jdlopez
I'd been noticing that the fuel gauge on my fit was non linear. For the first quarter tank I can put 100 miles on the car consistently. With this in mind you would think I could get 400 miles out of this car on one tank full.
Wrong.
I average 280 miles per tank full. That's me waiting for the 'idiot' light to light up. Over the last 3 fill ups, I've come up with this chart that shows how many miles I get out of this car at 1/4 tank, 1/2 tank, 3/4 tank and that last 1/4 tank...
Here what I came up with.
I'd never noticed that in any other car, and found it a little interesting, it must be the position of the float, I guess?
Wrong.
I average 280 miles per tank full. That's me waiting for the 'idiot' light to light up. Over the last 3 fill ups, I've come up with this chart that shows how many miles I get out of this car at 1/4 tank, 1/2 tank, 3/4 tank and that last 1/4 tank...
Here what I came up with.
I'd never noticed that in any other car, and found it a little interesting, it must be the position of the float, I guess?
#11
Actually, @ 292 if you fill up your tank with say 9.5 gallons you get 30.7mpg. Usually my idiot (fuel) light hits around 285 to 290 miles, and I fill it up with 9.2 gallons = 31.5 mpg.
The Fuel gauge is another matter all together. I don't use the fuel gauge to estimate fuel efficiency, but was suprised at how "non-linear" it was. I've mostly owned GM cars, my first Honda, my wife owned a 94 civic when we met. Most of my cars' fuel gauges were pretty darn close to linear. Just found it odd, but as long as I can drive close to 300 miles on 10 gallons of fuel I'll be ok.
The Fuel gauge is another matter all together. I don't use the fuel gauge to estimate fuel efficiency, but was suprised at how "non-linear" it was. I've mostly owned GM cars, my first Honda, my wife owned a 94 civic when we met. Most of my cars' fuel gauges were pretty darn close to linear. Just found it odd, but as long as I can drive close to 300 miles on 10 gallons of fuel I'll be ok.
#14
Originally Posted by watermelonman
Reportedly, they are designed to make you feel like you're getting good economy right after filling up.
I wish Honda was above this but apparently they are not.
I wish Honda was above this but apparently they are not.
Car companies do not do this to somehow "fool" people that they are getting good MPG right after fillup, what benefit would they have from that anyway?
#15
I had to laugh on my second tank when I finally found out at what point the light comes on. It comes on (orange) when there are 2 gallons (UK) left. That's around 90 miles of driving! I wonder if the light goes red a bit later on?
#16
Read this article. It answers most of the questions in this thread.
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/fuel-gauge.htm
http://auto.howstuffworks.com/fuel-gauge.htm
#17
Diary of a tank of fuel and gauge readings.
First of all, I'll apoligize, as my camera phone isn't very good quality.
Getting low on gas, need to put some in:
So, I fill it up - topping it off with 12.5 gallons:
Now it is all filled up and the trip meter is reset:
It finally drops down below F:
Now it is down to 1/2 tank:
Down to 1/4 tank - nice trip mileage on this one :
Fuel light finally comes on:
Stop to get some gas:
Only less than 12.2 gallons this time:
Filled back up again:
Getting low on gas, need to put some in:
So, I fill it up - topping it off with 12.5 gallons:
Now it is all filled up and the trip meter is reset:
It finally drops down below F:
Now it is down to 1/2 tank:
Down to 1/4 tank - nice trip mileage on this one :
Fuel light finally comes on:
Stop to get some gas:
Only less than 12.2 gallons this time:
Filled back up again:
#18
Originally Posted by Jetydosa
That makes no sense whatsoever. It is done from a design standpoint, period. The fuel tank is larger at the top than it is a the bottom from a "packaging" point of view, so naturally it fuel level will drop slower at first.
Car companies do not do this to somehow "fool" people that they are getting good MPG right after fillup, what benefit would they have from that anyway?
Car companies do not do this to somehow "fool" people that they are getting good MPG right after fillup, what benefit would they have from that anyway?
On the other hand, if it is just caused by the shape of the tank, why couldn't they report the volume accurately? It's not like modern cars don't have any data processing capacity. In fact it could be done with a single table mapping probe levels to fuel volume; no math required.
#20
u can squeeze in more even after the pump stops, i had a taurus before the fit which supposedly had a 16 gal tank, if i fill up when the light comes on, I can easily put in 3-4+ or gallons in the tank with patience, i used to fill it up to the cap totalling around 19 gal.... but i heard its not good for the car so since i got my fit i stopped doing that