General Fit Talk General Discussion on the Honda Fit/Jazz.

Fit MT quality?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 06-04-2006, 12:51 PM
bitterspeak's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: CA
Posts: 207
I think the Fit MT feels better than the Civic MT (06-07) that I've driven.
 
  #22  
Old 06-04-2006, 04:33 PM
singsing's Avatar
New Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 20
yeah the clutch engagment range is very narrow. Its easy to almost kill the engine if ur not paying attention. But its a very crisp and easy shifter. Each time you shift its very satisfying. Very solid and predictable. It needs a 6th gear though. The rpms get kinda high and loud at 80mph so i tend to drive slower - more like 70. But i guess thats good.
 
  #23  
Old 06-04-2006, 04:35 PM
conchewski's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Schwenksville, Pa
Posts: 95
Originally Posted by bani
How is the Fit MT gearbox quality? I test drove an AT fit and while I hate ATs in general, the AT in the fit was not too bad as far as ATs go.

However I dislike buying a car sight unseen... no dealers in the seattle area seem to have any MT fits to test drive. Is the fit's MT a good feel? Not too heavy or light, or clunky? No crappy clutch?
Had not driven a mt (on a regular basis in 20 years) so I wanted to test before driving. Compared to my past manuals experiences ('56 chevy, 65 mustang, u-haul trucks) - this is a dream. You won't be throwing out your shifting arm, that is for sure.
 
  #24  
Old 06-04-2006, 04:58 PM
Jetydosa's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: ATL GA
Posts: 224
To me the Fit's MT feels exactly like any other Honda. Which is to say its basically the benchmark for its class.
 
  #25  
Old 06-04-2006, 06:52 PM
ryotto's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 45
I test drove a MT fit. Compaired to my Integra GS-R, the fit is easyer to drive, and more forgiving. The clutch is real light, takes hardly any effort to push in, and the shifter was smoother. I didnt notice a problem with the pedal placement. also it was more forgiving when shifting gears, more smooth when engaging the clutch.
 
  #26  
Old 06-04-2006, 10:04 PM
Gordio's Avatar
Someone that spends his life on FitFreak.net
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: san francisco, ca, USA
Posts: 1,092
Originally Posted by singsing
yeah the clutch engagment range is very narrow. Its easy to almost kill the engine if ur not paying attention. But its a very crisp and easy shifter. Each time you shift its very satisfying. Very solid and predictable. It needs a 6th gear though. The rpms get kinda high and loud at 80mph so i tend to drive slower - more like 70. But i guess thats good.
Ive only driven 3 stick cars before the fit, and yea, when I got the car I stalled a lot. That "click" of a successful shift of the fit feels nice. And i agree it needs a 6 gear overdrive. I guess maybe they felt 6 gears on an entry level car is too many gears. But i'm glad 5th has acceleration power; even tho it's not a true OD, I still get good mileage.
 
  #27  
Old 06-04-2006, 10:17 PM
big Fit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: U.S.A. PACIFIC NORTHWEST
Posts: 545
Originally Posted by bani
How is the Fit MT gearbox quality? I test drove an AT fit and while I hate ATs in general, the AT in the fit was not too bad as far as ATs go.

However I dislike buying a car sight unseen... no dealers in the seattle area seem to have any MT fits to test drive. Is the fit's MT a good feel? Not too heavy or light, or clunky? No crappy clutch?
I bought my fit site unseen. I depend on Hondas reputations for fine engineering and dependability. I owned an 82 civic 5 speed for 13 years which was fine. Usually manuals do fine unless there is an engineering problem or a realy bad driver at the wheel
 
  #28  
Old 06-05-2006, 04:15 AM
bani's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 107
Originally Posted by big Fit
I bought my fit site unseen. I depend on Hondas reputations for fine engineering and dependability. I owned an 82 civic 5 speed for 13 years which was fine. Usually manuals do fine unless there is an engineering problem or a realy bad driver at the wheel
manuals do fine in general, but there are grades from "good" to "great".

the 2006 civic gearbox is "fair", the mazda3 is "great" as is the impreza wrx. i have yet to drive a MT fit as nobody seems to have them -- everyone is AT (wimps!).

i have driven a lot of different stick shifts in the past few weeks shopping for new cars and been taking a lot of notes.

i would never buy a gearbox sight unseen.
 
  #29  
Old 06-05-2006, 08:11 AM
Edwood's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 173
Clutch is too close to the brake. Would prefer it further away. So, no combat boots while driving the Fit.

Clutch has pretty long travel, but is nice and light. Kind of soft, but in the forgiving way. Good for someone to learn one. Very smooth. Expecially from 1st to 2nd. 4th to 5th is a bit rough, easier for a novice to accidently shift to 3rd instead. Don't like the loosey goosey rubber boot on the shifter, I can feel it flop around when shifting. I guess I like leather better.

Shifter is a little bit notchy, but in a good way. Throws are pretty long (I'm used to Mazda shifters), but very easy to shift. Unlike the Scion Tc which has shorter throws, but was very notchy and quite stiff.

I test drove a new Matrix too, and the clutch was heavier than the Fit, but the shifter felt a bit sloppy in comparison, but the throws were shorter.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fstyle751
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
63
01-17-2012 05:56 PM
housemuzik
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
14
12-16-2010 02:00 AM
Bowkr
General Fit Talk
21
01-18-2010 06:53 PM
Edison Carasio
General Fit Talk
90
06-11-2009 04:56 PM
Giggles
General Fit Talk
21
07-17-2008 06:20 AM



Quick Reply: Fit MT quality?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:51 PM.