General Fit Talk General Discussion on the Honda Fit/Jazz.

+MPG via CAI?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 08-23-2009 | 02:16 PM
accordguyintake's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,279
From: Garden Grove, CA
5 Year Member
i thought our cars have closed-loop fuel maps or whatever so it wouldn't be affected by induction temps? Im not 100% sure i just think i heard that more than a few times in the past

Also Short Ram intakes probably sucked alot for old-school hondas but does anyone notice that our cars are different? In an old short ram system, the filter was routed right next to the headers, SUPER heat soak. But our cars have the newer reversed header/intake manifold style like the K20/K24 "opposite" to how it was back in the older hondas. I believe there is wayy less heat than before. Also right below where a short ram sits, at least for manual tranny is the open road so im sure semi-cool air at least is going into our short rams
 

Last edited by accordguyintake; 08-23-2009 at 02:19 PM.
  #22  
Old 08-23-2009 | 02:53 PM
solbrothers's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 7,343
From: Vallejo, Ca
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by stevet47
Solbrothers is pretty much right, but you CAN get higher MPG with a warm air intake. It has been proven time and time again with ABA tests on ecomodder.com BUT, it comes with a price... you loose power, some engines will stumble at high rpms, etc.
oh, i totally believe in the hot air intake!! im not gonna do it, but it works for those who DO use it
 
  #23  
Old 08-23-2009 | 03:40 PM
goredox's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 28
From: Minneapolis, MN
I was going to buy a K&N drop in filter until I found this website.
Air Filter Filtration Test

I'll sacrifice a small gain in HP at high RPM for less dirt getting into my engine.
 
  #24  
Old 08-23-2009 | 04:04 PM
uRabbit's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 299
From: Seattle, WA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by goredox
I was going to buy a K&N drop in filter until I found this website.
Air Filter Filtration Test

I'll sacrifice a small gain in HP at high RPM for less dirt getting into my engine.
Now THAT is a very interesting and informative write-up. Thanks for the link!

However, I must say, when I ran my Mini's intake (which I'm sure filter worse than all those drop-ins), after over 20k miles, I never had a single engine problem.

So I am still looking for the highest mpg filter.

Edit: after a quick google search of keywords ihadnt previously tried, I found this small filter test for mileage: http://www.metrompg.com/posts/air-filter-part-1.htm
Stock drop-in filters are slightly better for mileage, but with the mony saved from not having to replace the K&N as much, I will be going with that.
 

Last edited by uRabbit; 08-23-2009 at 04:19 PM.
  #25  
Old 08-23-2009 | 06:11 PM
Kaotic Lazagna's Avatar
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 177
From: Sacramento, CA
On my MK3 GTI, I had a Neuspeed SRI. I had to switch to the stock box, and when I did, I lost 2 mpg. Never changed my driving habit that time either. On my first car, an NA Miata, I had a Racing Beat HAI, and I got craptastic gas mileage.

On my Yaris, I'm still on the stock air box, and never got around to getting an aftermarket intake on it yet.
 
  #26  
Old 08-23-2009 | 10:17 PM
accordguyintake's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,279
From: Garden Grove, CA
5 Year Member
i dont think the stock box is geared towards performance. It's probably optimised for the best throttle response, decent power, and quiet operation.
 
  #27  
Old 08-23-2009 | 10:52 PM
Daemione's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 578
From: Wilton, CT
Interesting posts, but the one from the Tundra forums doesn't strike me as being particularly accurate.

When was the last time you ever felt a cool breeze under the hood of a car/ truck?
When's the last time you stuck your hand in the engine bay while driving at speed? An engine bay does get a significant amount of fresh air - CAI designs for the Fit put the filter down in front of the transmission, and (in theory) capitalize on that. And the actual vacuum created by the intake as the ingests air pulls more fresh air into the engine bay from what's passing underneath it.

The air that the OEM (the one it came with from the factory, or Original Equipment Manufactured) air intake breathes in is usually from just behind the grille itself, or sometimes from a fenderwell. This "air charge" is actually cold (or ambient temperature air), as hot air will just drop your ignition timing (because of pre-ignition or detonation) as the temperature of the intake air increases, and take all your HP with it.
Our stock does, indeed, pull cold air from inside the fender. But have you looked at how large the hole is that it pulls from?

1) Why would the Manufacturer short you on the performance it could have for an extra $100?
Easy, the manufacturer has to be concerned about noise reduction and hydrolock prevention. As enthusiasts, our priorities are probably going to differ from theirs.

Add to that the water protection that a stock OEM air box is designed to provide. Water intrusion is a HUGE concern to prevent damage . . .
He said it himself - hydrolock is a huge concern for them. They need to have a system that's as foolproof as possible for people who will do incredibly stupid things with their car. Placing the air inlet lower to the ground is a risk we're taking - we just have to be aware that driving through foot deep water will be dangerous (not that it isn't ill advised aside from intake concerns).

But the biggest improvement in efficiency in an aftermarket intake isn't necessarily related to the air temperature - it's in the reduction of pumping losses. Every time a piston goes downwards to pull air through the intake valve, it's using energy to do so. So by providing a better sized tube and freer flowing filter to breathe through, it has to do less work to pull in the air it needs. Again, have you guys looked at how tiny stock airbox's inlet is?
 
  #28  
Old 08-23-2009 | 11:29 PM
uRabbit's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 299
From: Seattle, WA
5 Year Member
I think I'm just going to have to spend the money sometime down the road to figure it out for myself, and then do a write-up on it. I will not purchase a name brand one, when I can get one from Shucks. I know the more expensive ones are more resistant to heat, but I won't exacty be putting my car thru strenuous activities.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
fit246
Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning
0
11-13-2011 09:14 PM
Rod2Rice
Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning
2
06-25-2008 07:55 PM
whitey810
General Fit Talk
9
06-09-2008 07:25 PM
dank24
General Fit Talk
10
09-24-2007 02:26 AM
RCCOLA
General Fit Talk
6
05-08-2007 03:42 AM



Quick Reply: +MPG via CAI?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:12 PM.