Fit Compared to Wagovan
#1
Fit Compared to Wagovan
I am curiouis how the Fit compares to the old Civic Wagovan in terms of dimensions (height width length cargo capacity etc.). I have not had much luck searching on the web. Does anybody have some info on this vehicle? I know several people have said the Fit reminds them of this vehicle.
Thanks.
Thanks.
#3
1990 Civic Wagon Specs
1990 Honda Civic Wagon (from Edmunds.com)
Exterior
Length: 161.7 in. Width: 66.1 in.
Height: 56.1 in. Wheel Base: 98.4 in.
Curb Weight: 2335 lbs.
Interior
Front Head Room: 39.4 in. Front Hip Room: 50.1 in.
Front Shoulder Room: 53.5 in. Rear Head Room: 38 in.
Rear Shoulder Room: 53.5 in. Rear Hip Room: 52 in.
Front Leg Room: 41.2 in. Rear Leg Room: 33.2 in.
Luggage Capacity: 21.5 cu. ft. Maximum Seating: 5
Performance
Base Number of Cylinders: 4 Base Engine Size: 1.5 liters
Base Engine Type: Inline 4 Horsepower: 92 hp
Max Horsepower: 6000 rpm Torque: 89 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 4500 rpm Drive Type: FWD
Turning Circle: 32.1 ft.
Fuel
Fuel Tank Capacity: 11.9 gal.
EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway)
Manual: 31 mpg / 34 mpg Automatic: : 28 mpg / 32 mpg
Range in Miles: (City/Highway)
Automatic: 333.2 mi. / 380.8 mi. Manual: 368.9 mi. / 404.6 mi.
Exterior
Length: 161.7 in. Width: 66.1 in.
Height: 56.1 in. Wheel Base: 98.4 in.
Curb Weight: 2335 lbs.
Interior
Front Head Room: 39.4 in. Front Hip Room: 50.1 in.
Front Shoulder Room: 53.5 in. Rear Head Room: 38 in.
Rear Shoulder Room: 53.5 in. Rear Hip Room: 52 in.
Front Leg Room: 41.2 in. Rear Leg Room: 33.2 in.
Luggage Capacity: 21.5 cu. ft. Maximum Seating: 5
Performance
Base Number of Cylinders: 4 Base Engine Size: 1.5 liters
Base Engine Type: Inline 4 Horsepower: 92 hp
Max Horsepower: 6000 rpm Torque: 89 ft-lbs.
Max Torque: 4500 rpm Drive Type: FWD
Turning Circle: 32.1 ft.
Fuel
Fuel Tank Capacity: 11.9 gal.
EPA Mileage Estimates: (City/Highway)
Manual: 31 mpg / 34 mpg Automatic: : 28 mpg / 32 mpg
Range in Miles: (City/Highway)
Automatic: 333.2 mi. / 380.8 mi. Manual: 368.9 mi. / 404.6 mi.
#5
Great - Thanks!
It really is close to the Fit. About 4 inches longer, but 4 inches lower. I remembered the first generation, but had forgotten about the second generation - nice looking vehicle. I can't believe they did not sell a ton of them.
I am guessing the older version was a tad shorter.
It really is close to the Fit. About 4 inches longer, but 4 inches lower. I remembered the first generation, but had forgotten about the second generation - nice looking vehicle. I can't believe they did not sell a ton of them.
I am guessing the older version was a tad shorter.
#6
Originally Posted by DRum
Great - Thanks!
It really is close to the Fit. About 4 inches longer, but 4 inches lower. I remembered the first generation, but had forgotten about the second generation - nice looking vehicle. I can't believe they did not sell a ton of them.
I am guessing the older version was a tad shorter.
It really is close to the Fit. About 4 inches longer, but 4 inches lower. I remembered the first generation, but had forgotten about the second generation - nice looking vehicle. I can't believe they did not sell a ton of them.
I am guessing the older version was a tad shorter.
I purchased a 4WD Civic Wagon in 1985 and put 225,000 miles (362,102 km) on it over a 10 year span.
I'm sure glad to see a small (on the outside) Honda Wagon once again. I can't wait for next week, my Silver "S" is due to arrive
#8
Originally Posted by DewaltDakota
Just in case you didn't know what they looked like, here's the 1984 version:
... and in 1990:
... and in 1990:
#9
Originally Posted by FondaFit
The Scion xB seems to be the "in" car for small businesses now.
#10
That picture is a dead ringer for my '84 Civic Wagon. (Wag-0-Van had clothes hanging rods in the rear side windows and lacked the sleeper seats. The rear seats were not split)
The Wagon seats folded into beds and I spent many a night on an air mattress in a sleeping bag. I put 283,000 miles it with only muffler (2) and oil changes. Original clutch. I sold it because I wanted air bags and safety features. The car was fast and fun to drive.
If the Fit is half as good, it will be worth twice the price!
The Wagon seats folded into beds and I spent many a night on an air mattress in a sleeping bag. I put 283,000 miles it with only muffler (2) and oil changes. Original clutch. I sold it because I wanted air bags and safety features. The car was fast and fun to drive.
If the Fit is half as good, it will be worth twice the price!
#11
Originally Posted by DewaltDakota
Just in case you didn't know what they looked like, here's the 1984 version:
... and in 1990:
... and in 1990:
#12
Originally Posted by FondaFit
Looks just like my baby, 1985, but in white. It held an incredible amount of cargo, 6 ft. plus people, and got 40 mpg highway. What a car!! No mechanical problems, just routine maintenance. Wish I hadn't sold it after 10 years and 165,000 miles. (Bought an Accord wagon -- loved it, too, but it didn't get the good mileage, and it actually was more road noisy!) The Fit reminds me of CW and I'll let you know next week how similar I think they are. I whined to a salesman at a local dealer (who told me to check out the Fit) and even wrote to Honda begging them to bring the Civic wagon back. There was a Wagovan version, which was more austere (and I think it only came in MT), popular for small businesses that used it for cargo rather than people. I used to see them painted up with advertisements (like florists). The Scion xB seems to be the "in" car for small businesses now.
#13
Originally Posted by wandafreely
I've sent Honda a letter every year since 1996 asking them to bring the wagon back...took them a while, though, didn't it?!?
I patiently waited for the 1992 Civic Wagons to come out with air bags and ABS. I was going to buy one.
They never came out.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
B18C5-EH2
General Fit Talk
18
05-27-2011 10:05 PM