General Fit Talk General Discussion on the Honda Fit/Jazz.

Gas mileage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 04-06-2006 | 09:26 PM
DRum's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 451
From: South Dakota
Gas mileage

What kind of gas mileage (or kilometerage) are people getting with their fits?

Please indicate transmission type, percent highway/city, and highway speed.

Thanks - I am curious to see how the Fit does compared to its EPA numbers. Some cars barely get the highway figure, and others are way over.
 
  #2  
Old 04-06-2006 | 09:50 PM
Gordio's Avatar
Someone that spends his life on FitFreak.net
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,092
From: san francisco, ca, USA
car and driver said 35mpg observed. Edmund's said 32.

I too want to know numbers, especially auto's since both are manual's numbers.
 
  #3  
Old 04-25-2006 | 01:57 PM
kurtneis's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 22
From: north hollywood, ca
after my first fill up i got 33.3 mpg too bad gas cost is already 3.25
 
  #4  
Old 04-26-2006 | 08:40 PM
DRum's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 451
From: South Dakota
33.4 is pretty good for all city driving. Nevertheless it should improve as it breaks in - maybe a couple more mpg.
 
  #5  
Old 04-27-2006 | 02:31 AM
Squid's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 53
From: California
I was laid up today with back trouble, and did some geeking on my laptop. If anyone's interested in an excel spreadsheet to keep track of mpg and total fuel cost, PM me with your email address.
 
  #6  
Old 04-28-2006 | 03:15 PM
dgszweda's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 3
From: United States
My first full tank of gas. I have covered 310 miles so far and have a 1/3 of a tank left. The tank should hold about 10.8 US gallons. I have kept it mostly under 3200 rpm and it has been mostly highway driving. We will see where it goes. I hope to get at least 400+ miles from a tank of gas.
 
  #7  
Old 04-28-2006 | 10:33 PM
b17gsr's Avatar
Someone that spends his life on FitFreak.net
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,110
From: Ottawa, Ontario
If you look at the Canadian estimated fuel consumption (according to the 2006 guidelines):

All manual models: 7.3 L /100kms (32.2 US MPG) city, 5.8 L /100kms (40.5 US MPG) highway.
non Sport auto models: 7.8 L /100kms (30.1 US MPG) city, 5.6 L /100kms (42.0 US MPG) highway.
Sport auto models: 8.0 L /100kms (29.4 US MPG) city, 5.6 L /100kms (42.0 US MPG) highway.

I used this site: http://www.tdiclub.com/misc/conversions.html

Just remember that the EPA estimates aren't 100% accurate.
 
  #8  
Old 04-28-2006 | 10:41 PM
plus_c's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 161
From: Philadelphia
Do you know what the Canadian test methods are? Are they overly optimistic like the EPA ones? How do "real-world" numbers for Canadian cars stack up against the government estimates in general?
 
  #9  
Old 04-29-2006 | 02:06 AM
sanantoneFIT's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 10
From: San Antonio, TX
First tank cost me just over $26 @ 9.3 gallons. Got 34.7 mpg..."low light" came on 10 miles from the station. So...one's got about a gallon and a half when it comes on?!?!?!
 
  #10  
Old 04-29-2006 | 08:09 AM
jake95825's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 37
From: Sacramento
Mpg

1st tank - 32.1 mpg 50% highway 50% city
 
  #11  
Old 04-29-2006 | 11:17 PM
coldstorage5's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 243
From: Croton, NY
I got 33.5.
Highway and local. ( have not gone past 65, though)
Very pleased. If this keeps up, I save some money.
 
  #12  
Old 04-30-2006 | 01:31 PM
verily's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 113
From: Austin, TX
I wonder what the halfway point and Empty point on the gauge is in terms of gallons? I've driven a couple cars that hid a gallon or two below the E, so you wouldn't ever actually run out of gas.

I got about 34 MPG of highway driving the other day. I drove about 170 miles on less than half the tank. I kept the speed fairly consistent around 60-65 mph; first time I've done the drive without cruise control in a car, but the accelerator is light enough that your foot will keep the speed just right.
 

Last edited by verily; 04-30-2006 at 01:34 PM.
  #13  
Old 05-01-2006 | 12:12 PM
dartvader's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 70
From: Philadelphia, PA
here's a question: how can the sport and base get the same mileage when the sport has wider tires? all things being equal (and aren't they in this case?) the base should do a little better, right?
 
  #14  
Old 05-01-2006 | 12:15 PM
plus_c's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 161
From: Philadelphia
Maybe the difference is slight enough that it doesn't show up after rounding?
 
  #15  
Old 05-02-2006 | 01:39 AM
DRum's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 451
From: South Dakota
Originally Posted by dartvader
here's a question: how can the sport and base get the same mileage when the sport has wider tires? all things being equal (and aren't they in this case?) the base should do a little better, right?

If 2 cars have the same engine and tranny they can share EPA results if they are withing 500 lbs of each other. GM even does this between makes (buick and pontiac share numbers etc.)
 
  #16  
Old 05-02-2006 | 11:23 AM
tnfit's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 21
From: smyrna, tennessee
1st tank - 278 miles (still showing 1/4 tank), 7.68 gallons (topped it off) = 36 mpg!

Mixed city/highway driving, A/C part of the time...

I'm quite pleased!
 
  #17  
Old 05-02-2006 | 05:11 PM
Wessy's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 13
From: Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
Thanks for sharing all your MPG figures, everybody! tnfit, what model (Base or Sport) and transmission were you driving that delivered 36 MPG?
 
  #18  
Old 05-02-2006 | 08:54 PM
pokems23's Avatar
June 2007 3rd Place Fit of the Month Winner
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 570
From: Tacoma, WA
about 32 first tank= high hill Seattle, then 38 fairly flat roads mainly highway driving at 65-70 mph
 
  #19  
Old 05-03-2006 | 01:26 PM
dartvader's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 70
From: Philadelphia, PA
supposedly the seet spot is about 50 mph due to wind resistance although obviously gearing and aeirodynamics can mitigate.
 
  #20  
Old 05-03-2006 | 05:09 PM
Karvin Karl's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 139
From: Detroit, Michigan
35 mpg again! Amazing: it spins at 4000 RPMs / 80 MPH and still delivers 35 MPG.
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:22 AM.