2009 Fit RPM
#1
2009 Fit RPM
I just found the 2009 spec and the RPM's at 60 did not get better as I had hopped. In fact it's 30RPM's higher
Looking at the MT only
+49 lb Sport MT no NAV over 2008
+30 more RPMS at speed
Shifter the power band up
I'll be surprised if the 09 will be as capable as the older ones for Eco.
Looking at the MT only
+49 lb Sport MT no NAV over 2008
+30 more RPMS at speed
Shifter the power band up
I'll be surprised if the 09 will be as capable as the older ones for Eco.
#4
#6
Hmmm, looks like Honda has figured out the magic formula for selling the new Fit.
Power > Eco
Last edited by Sugarphreak; 08-22-2008 at 01:50 AM.
#8
If you look close the HP is up, but at a way higher RPM peak. The Tq is the same. Same RPM and Tq
My comment was based on FE in capable hands. I'm thinking an expert hypermiller will not be able to get the same as an 07 08 MT EPA is for sure 1 less and that's telling and in line with what I listed.
I'm also glad I did not wait. That was an option for sure. I wanted an Eco car 1st and all the other Fit features over others like the Yaris was just a bonus.
Who ever rolls out a EPA 50mpg hiway car for less than $20k will have a winner. I think Honda is working on that like the others. Maybe not in 2009 but for sure in 2010
My comment was based on FE in capable hands. I'm thinking an expert hypermiller will not be able to get the same as an 07 08 MT EPA is for sure 1 less and that's telling and in line with what I listed.
I'm also glad I did not wait. That was an option for sure. I wanted an Eco car 1st and all the other Fit features over others like the Yaris was just a bonus.
Who ever rolls out a EPA 50mpg hiway car for less than $20k will have a winner. I think Honda is working on that like the others. Maybe not in 2009 but for sure in 2010
#9
I too was disappointed to see the FE #s for the 2009. Consider this though:
1. The early published reviews are indicating a "real-world" mpg estimate of ~40mpg (combined) with the MT. It would be great if this turned out to be true.
2. The EPA test is skewed towards "normal" driving. If #1 is true then what could a hypermiler get with this thing (50mpg+?!?!)?
Given that there were gearing ratio changes, and the 09' didn't loose much compared to the 08', then we can't be sure that the i-VTEC is to blame for the decrease in FE here (maybe it will even help get a better FE with some technique). Although HP is optimized at a higher RPM in the i-VTEC, who is to say that FE is worse in the 09' than the 08' when running at lower RPMS (I would guess the EPA omits lower RPM accel and cruising from their test) ?
Also, could having more HP and torque allow a quicker (more efficient?) accelleration for P&G?
1. The early published reviews are indicating a "real-world" mpg estimate of ~40mpg (combined) with the MT. It would be great if this turned out to be true.
2. The EPA test is skewed towards "normal" driving. If #1 is true then what could a hypermiler get with this thing (50mpg+?!?!)?
Given that there were gearing ratio changes, and the 09' didn't loose much compared to the 08', then we can't be sure that the i-VTEC is to blame for the decrease in FE here (maybe it will even help get a better FE with some technique). Although HP is optimized at a higher RPM in the i-VTEC, who is to say that FE is worse in the 09' than the 08' when running at lower RPMS (I would guess the EPA omits lower RPM accel and cruising from their test) ?
Also, could having more HP and torque allow a quicker (more efficient?) accelleration for P&G?
Last edited by BlackUp; 08-23-2008 at 05:12 PM.
#10
blackup
Just as a point of ref. There are a few that get 60mpg tanks now. SAome have got 70mpg segments. Really
50 is within reach on anyone with a MT and willing. No mods needed just higher air pressure and driving techniques.
All that said I'm sure by year end we will have a few MT 09's in capable hands and will know for sure what they are capable of.
I think Honda sucks for not making a FE version available to us here in the USA. In fact I also think they suck for not using this form as a great interface to NA users.
Just as a point of ref. There are a few that get 60mpg tanks now. SAome have got 70mpg segments. Really
50 is within reach on anyone with a MT and willing. No mods needed just higher air pressure and driving techniques.
All that said I'm sure by year end we will have a few MT 09's in capable hands and will know for sure what they are capable of.
I think Honda sucks for not making a FE version available to us here in the USA. In fact I also think they suck for not using this form as a great interface to NA users.
#11
BTW. what is a "NA user?"
Last edited by BlackUp; 08-23-2008 at 09:44 PM.
#12
I'm disappointed but . . .
The jury is still out on how the 2009 will do in the hands of capable drivers.
I will wait a bit and see how things shake out with this revision. If it doesn't look like it will be any more fuel efficient, I will wait for the new "Insight" (or whatever) Hybrid or Fit Hybrid.
My 2007 will still have great residual value when I get ready to do something.
Let's not be too quick to count Honda out.
All things taken into consideration, the Fit is a great car. We fans tend to complain a lot because all of our expectations are not met. On this site I hear many complain about the cost, the lack of certain features, that it could be more eco, that it could be more performance oriented etc.
Honda is trying to please many groups with this one model and it's a balancing act to try to offer what most potential buyers are really looking for. No car manufacturer is doing this perfectly for a car in this class, but I think that Honda has done it best with the Fit.
I will wait a bit and see how things shake out with this revision. If it doesn't look like it will be any more fuel efficient, I will wait for the new "Insight" (or whatever) Hybrid or Fit Hybrid.
My 2007 will still have great residual value when I get ready to do something.
Let's not be too quick to count Honda out.
All things taken into consideration, the Fit is a great car. We fans tend to complain a lot because all of our expectations are not met. On this site I hear many complain about the cost, the lack of certain features, that it could be more eco, that it could be more performance oriented etc.
Honda is trying to please many groups with this one model and it's a balancing act to try to offer what most potential buyers are really looking for. No car manufacturer is doing this perfectly for a car in this class, but I think that Honda has done it best with the Fit.
#13
I do agree, it's too early to tell because someone might come out with a mod for more FE. Also, these EPA test aren't done with mods? Honda or some aftermarket company might come out with some secret with generic computer chip to make the car more fuel efficient. It's still way too early to tell. But so far, stock 09's don't look as good for FE driving habbits. We'll have to wait and see what mods + hypermiling will do for it before passing the final judgement.
#14
It true like I has said when I started this thread the fact is HONDA did nothing to help FE and when you look close, they did a few things to hurt FE
My prediction based on those facts is it will be less capable than the older gen of FE. It's too bad for us.
PS Remember this is the Eco area and we are not talking other performance here.
Last edited by pcs0snq; 08-24-2008 at 07:50 AM.
#15
Huuu Just like the mods for the 06 to 08 which at last count is zero. I would not hold your breath on that no matter how optimistic you are, based on the last 3 years.
It true like I has said when I started this thread the fact is HONDA did nothing to help FE and when you look close, they did a few things to hurt FE
My prediction based on those facts is it will be less capable than the older gen of FE. It's too bad for us.
PS Remember this is the Eco area and we are not talking other performance here.
It true like I has said when I started this thread the fact is HONDA did nothing to help FE and when you look close, they did a few things to hurt FE
My prediction based on those facts is it will be less capable than the older gen of FE. It's too bad for us.
PS Remember this is the Eco area and we are not talking other performance here.
- Additional horsepower
- Lower gearing
- Additional weight
Honda is also looking over their shoulder at Toyota, Nissan, and others.
We know that a Fit Hybrid is coming, but meanwhile I wouldn't be surprised if Honda added a 6th gear to the MT. Don't the Versa and Mazda 3 have it?
Well, we can only hope.
Last edited by jrlnc; 08-24-2008 at 09:07 AM.
#17
I can tell you the 5th gear RPM at any speed for the MT Sport if you want.
#18
that sounds good Paul.
if it isn't a hastle can you give me 40-70mph
like 40-45-50-55-60-65-70
it woud be much appreciated.
thanks
Nick
Last edited by niko3257; 08-24-2008 at 07:39 PM.
#19
40
1878
45
2114
50
2350
55
2586
60
2822
65
3058
70
3294