Fit Suspension & Brake Modifications Threads discussing suspension and brake related modifications for the Honda Fit

Skunk2 Lower springs- NOT for 15" rims

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #41  
Old 12-14-2006, 12:12 PM
docjim2's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 431
w1ndex on your lowering springs how much was the car lowered?
 
  #42  
Old 12-14-2006, 03:43 PM
w1ndex's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Chuckey, TN
Posts: 28












 
  #43  
Old 12-14-2006, 04:26 PM
gimme's Avatar
Administrator
5 Year Member
iTrader: (13)
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 4,253
soooo, are you selling the springs? hit me up if you are
 
  #44  
Old 02-10-2007, 02:21 AM
jdmjazz's Avatar
New Member
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 15
Originally Posted by koolkevin1107
the reason why i is harsher is b/c it is a linear spring and not progressive like the tanabe's. That was the only reason why i did not go for the skunk 2's and went for the tanabe gf210's. They have the same drop and stance as the skunk 2 but they are progressive (means that during regular driving it feels like a normal spring but when u get on the freeway or drive the car hard, the springs stiffen up and give u a stiffer ride) plus progressives are safe to use w/ stock shocks.

If you want a nice drop get the gf210's. If you want a little bit smoother ride but don't want a huge drop go for the df210's. If you want ur car SLAMMED then get the nf210's (when they come out).
I think the DF210's drop is 1.8 / 1.3 .. whereas the gf210's 1.2 / 1.0 ... so doesnt that make the df210's a huger drop?.. is the df210 progressive as well ?
 
  #45  
Old 02-10-2007, 03:52 PM
Paulo107's Avatar
June 2007 1st Place Fit of the Month Winner
5 Year Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: The Latin Pot
Posts: 1,664


well i will confirm with my set up that skunk2 springs + rims 15x7 w/42 offset + Falken azenis 205/50= no rubbing
 
  #46  
Old 02-10-2007, 08:58 PM
Deivioncrx's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 151
Some of it is the difference in the 205/55 and the stock 195/55

with the stock tire, you had a side wall of 4.22"

with the 205/55, your side wall is 4.43"

so youve gained almost a 1/4 of tire, and thats just based on math, a 205 Falken is not anywhere close to a 205 BFGoodrich, or a 205 Yokohamma, and the sidewalls are a percentage of the tread width, so you could eazly have between 1/4" and 3/4" more tire under the car than somebody with the stock tires.

you probaly would not have any problems with a 205/50/15. as it should have 4.03" sidewall
 
  #47  
Old 02-12-2007, 02:12 PM
docjim2's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 431
dave92029
I have always used EIBACH springs and am surprised at the ride. Maybe you should have looked into them before making a decision. But we all must remember the real height of the FIT from pavement to undercarriage... with my Megan Racing muffler and pipe lowering my car to 1.6 front and 2.0 in rear would mean that I would REALLY have to be careful when going up or down steep driveways and VERY SLOW over speed humps... not to mention parking w/o scraping my front fender on the parking space wheel stops!
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
QuickGD3
For Sale / Want To Buy / Classified Ads for USED Fit Items
3
07-08-2010 04:19 AM
ruelthewOrld
Fit Suspension & Brake Modifications
1
03-02-2010 09:25 PM
GD3 IS GO!
General Fit Talk
1
07-23-2008 03:40 AM
pastadog
Fit Suspension & Brake Modifications
22
03-13-2008 12:45 PM



Quick Reply: Skunk2 Lower springs- NOT for 15" rims



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:18 PM.