Fit Suspension & Brake Modifications Threads discussing suspension and brake related modifications for the Honda Fit

Enduratech Coilovers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #181  
Old 08-31-2008, 12:16 AM
radareclipse's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nanuet, NY
Posts: 821
Shipping up north is barely more than shipping coast to coast in the U.S. I order from AJ Racing in B.C. and I live in NY.
 
  #182  
Old 09-01-2008, 06:18 PM
kenchan's Avatar
Official Fit Blogger of FitFreak
5 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OG Club
Posts: 20,289
i think there was duty involved.
 
  #183  
Old 09-01-2008, 06:28 PM
honda_david's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 278
sent endura-tech a PM. let me know, thanks.
 
  #184  
Old 09-04-2008, 11:15 PM
Endura-Tech's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 96
PM replied. Thanks David!
 
  #185  
Old 09-06-2008, 10:47 PM
eldaino's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,705
Originally Posted by kennef
btw, the rake that you see in certain cars is due to a wide variety of factors. in fact, a car can have a visual front to rear slope while actually having a slightly higher ride height in front than it does in the back. the visual rake you mention is actually your visual perception of that vehicle's side profile as a whole. the fact that it has a slightly higher front ride height is due to corner balancing, where individually height-adjustable coilovers are adjusted, per corner, to achieve the best possible distribution of weight. front heavy cars (all FWDs, most AWDs) actually try to distribute some weight to the back (by raising the front relative to the rear heights) in order to reduce the polar moment of inertia up front, which reduces front wheel load, distributes some of the work to the rear wheels, and improves responsiveness to steering wheel inputs.

now, on a let's be real note, i know that most people buy coilovers for the purpose of having an "adjustable" ride height which really means that individual wants to lower his car as low as possible, while retaining the option to raise it back up once tired of riding on bumpstops and scraping body kits. suspension performance is, at best, a secondary thought (as evidenced by the popularity of teins) and frankly, i'm OK with that. people should feel perfectly free to do as they wish with their hard earned money.

on another note, i have no doubt that enduratech in their heart of hearts wants to do the right thing and not give casual performance consumers a product that may be too neutral (handling-wise) that would cause folks to be a danger to themselves.

i say this to say, for the performance minded folks out there, carefully consider what you buy.

whats wrong with tein? i thought they were pretty performance oriented.
 
  #186  
Old 09-07-2008, 05:31 AM
Spooling's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 1,019
am I correct in believing ET is not suited for track applications?
 
  #187  
Old 09-07-2008, 08:16 AM
kenchan's Avatar
Official Fit Blogger of FitFreak
5 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OG Club
Posts: 20,289
Originally Posted by 1WayFit
am I correct in believing ET is not suited for track applications?
the ET's are biased for daily driving comfort with some weekend spirited
runs. if you're a weekend roadcourse kinda guy im sure they would do
fine, but if you race all the time and barely use the car for dd, you
will want a different setup with full damper adjustabilty to enable you
to dial-in your exact setup.

but then again, if i was in that arena, i would bring my other cars to
the track.
 
  #188  
Old 09-23-2008, 02:51 PM
Mercurio's Avatar
New Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 4
you got pm.
 
  #189  
Old 09-23-2008, 03:31 PM
honda_david's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 278
i'm a new customer of endura-tech, and i just want to say that the coilovers are GREAT! the ride is pretty smooth. i set the coilovers to as far as they could go, and so far so good. my previous suspension setup were eibach sportline springs, and i just want to say that these coilovers are not as bumpy as those were. like kenchan said, they're smooth for coilovers.
the customer service was good and quick too. so far, i have no complaints for these and would recommend them to anyone.
 
  #190  
Old 09-23-2008, 03:46 PM
kenchan's Avatar
Official Fit Blogger of FitFreak
5 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OG Club
Posts: 20,289
hey sounds good hondadavid.

still got mine at -1.8" f -1.3" r on 195/50/15's. for me it's been the
best setup for all the huge dips and bumps we have in chicagoland.
i dont need to worry about scraping or bottoming out on the bumpstops...
yet the ride looks lowered and tight.
 
  #191  
Old 09-24-2008, 10:23 AM
Endura-Tech's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 96
Originally Posted by Mercurio
you got pm.
PM responded to. Was out of the office Tuesday.

Honda David, Thanks for the kind words.
 
  #192  
Old 09-25-2008, 06:11 PM
rawrItsJello's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA 0
Posts: 267
i'm sorry I dont look at the previous pages, but how much is the going price for your fine product? this might be the suspension of choice in the next couple months.. after I get my bodywork & rims done.
 
  #193  
Old 09-25-2008, 08:51 PM
honda_david's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 278
$899 plus shipping...for me, it was about $940. really good deal for such a good quality product.
 
  #194  
Old 09-26-2008, 10:50 AM
Endura-Tech's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 96
Originally Posted by rawrItsJello
i'm sorry I dont look at the previous pages, but how much is the going price for your fine product? this might be the suspension of choice in the next couple months.. after I get my bodywork & rims done.
The price of the Endura-Tech coilovers delivered to Las Vegas would be around $944.00. Thanks for the interest and let me know if there is anything else that you need.
 
  #195  
Old 09-26-2008, 02:09 PM
rawrItsJello's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA 0
Posts: 267
after i install my body kit.. i'll be contacting you soon
 
  #196  
Old 09-26-2008, 02:42 PM
Endura-Tech's Avatar
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 96
Originally Posted by rawrItsJello
after i install my body kit.. i'll be contacting you soon
Cheers! Have fun with your install and drive safe.
 
  #197  
Old 09-27-2008, 04:13 AM
kevvur's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 219
The tire gap bugs the hell out of me lol.

I'm looking to lower my car (picking up an 08 black fit sport in the morning) but I have no idea where to start. I was never really a car techie so what's the difference between having a set of coilovers and just using springs? Springs go for ~$2-300 whereas the coilovers are $8-900. I plan to keep using my stock sport rims/tires for a while
 
  #198  
Old 09-27-2008, 07:57 AM
kenchan's Avatar
Official Fit Blogger of FitFreak
5 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OG Club
Posts: 20,289
Originally Posted by kevvur
The tire gap bugs the hell out of me lol.

I'm looking to lower my car (picking up an 08 black fit sport in the morning) but I have no idea where to start. I was never really a car techie so what's the difference between having a set of coilovers and just using springs? Springs go for ~$2-300 whereas the coilovers are $8-900. I plan to keep using my stock sport rims/tires for a while
lowering springs on stock dampers can work if the dampers are firm
out of the factory. but the Fit's dampers are pretty soft and when you
reduce the shock travel using lowering springs it will full bump (full stroke)
the shocks very easily if you are lowered any more than 1". if you want
to go on a budget, try finding a low spring rate, linear rate spring set.

i tried some DF210's on my car before, over stock springs. i cut the
bumpstops, etc as the instructions say. it felt good over smooth surface
but very different over bumps and dips. the sus just full bumped easily
even going over normal dips on the road. it was uncomfy. also, being
that they were progressive rate springs, the car swayed left/right very
easily by crosswind, it felt disconnected. so then i naturally tried
the rear swaybar. it was tight going straight, but still, the ride was
quite terrible vs wat my other modded cars feel even on a much stiffer
setup...plus the swaybar made the car feel like shit running +40offset
15x7 wheels.

on the Enduratechs, not only are the springs linear rate and low rate
springs, the shocks are shorter and comes with new bumpstops, etc. so
it lowers the car while still maintain a full stroke of the suspension.
i have yet to scrape bottom at my current setup which is basically
where the ET' come preset out of the box. comes with step by step
instructions with pictures so very easy to install too. and no need for
the rear swaybar. i tried it with and without the swaybar on the ET's
and car feels much better without the rear swaybar.
 
  #199  
Old 09-27-2008, 02:04 PM
eldaino's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 2,705
kenchan:

how do you feel these compare to the tein basics? (i think i remember you commenting on how teins are kinda noisy in the past?)

the front/rear spring rate thing that kennef brought up is kinda bothering me too...

as someone who has 2 other great handling cars, do you find that the enduratechs make you understeer MORE than the stock set up?

i dd my car, but i attack the backroads often and eventually would like to run my car in autox' events every few months when i'm done with it.

but daily driveability is still the priority, but i don't just want to lower my car and make it look better if it wont perform better.

thoughts?
 
  #200  
Old 09-27-2008, 06:28 PM
kenchan's Avatar
Official Fit Blogger of FitFreak
5 Year Member
iTrader: (4)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OG Club
Posts: 20,289
Originally Posted by eldaino
kenchan:

how do you feel these compare to the tein basics? (i think i remember you commenting on how teins are kinda noisy in the past?)

the front/rear spring rate thing that kennef brought up is kinda bothering me too...

as someone who has 2 other great handling cars, do you find that the enduratechs make you understeer MORE than the stock set up?

i dd my car, but i attack the backroads often and eventually would like to run my car in autox' events every few months when i'm done with it.

but daily driveability is still the priority, but i don't just want to lower my car and make it look better if it wont perform better.

thoughts?
the TEIN's i had were the TypeHA's which were the previous generation
before the FLEX came out. i also had the TypeNA's which were the perch
type. so i don't have actual experience with the Basics. the HA's were
pretty noisy...and it wasn't just from the pillowmounts. it was coming
from inside the shock housing. they worked very well for the setup i had
on my 98 prelude... to carve canyons. i use to live in LA and went to
Malibu every weekend to carve the santamonica canyons. I went
through Dunlop SP8000's every 3-3.5k miles.

the HA's i had on the 02WRX were crap. the spring rates were too high.
TEIN c/o in general were(are?) not THAT great as a lot of folks think,
imho for street. the primary reason is because TEIN's philosophy seems to
be that they want to stiffen up the suspension to the point where the
user can optimize running their ideal alignment angles. (alignment angles
change throughout the suspension stroke) that could work on the track,
but you loose daily drivability. plus, that's quite a bit of burden on the
tires. you need to run good tires to fully benefit the TEIN philosophy.

if your friend's voices are shaking while talking, your ride is
not dailydriver friendly. i you're karaoke'ing inside your car and your
friends all have perfect vibrato's, your car is not dailydriver friendly.
if you need to dodge manhole lids, you got a bad setup.
im sure some of you know wat im talking about. been there done
that. i learned from my mistakes. basically, you didnt do your home
work or trial/error resulting in your sus being too stiff.


a good system will absorb bumps and contain it instantly. and no vibrato
in people's voices. one way to achieve this is to ride on lower spring
rate while running higher damp rate.

i started running my own setups about 7yrs ago on my cars by selecting
springs (looking at the various spring rate offerings from many
manufacturers), dampers, adjustable swaybars, different offset wheels,
different width wheels and tires, and putting together my own system
with countless trial and error, going to the alignment shop over and over
again. the results have been a solid handling car with lots of comfort
while riding -1.5"+ lower than stock on 35 profile tires. it's quite an
achievement if you think about the roads we have here in chicagoland.

i was planning to do the same kinda custom setup on the FitS, but as you
all know, there are no decent adjustable dampers out there for the USDM
other then the upcoming Tokico's... so i tried the DF210's on stock
dampers, fixed rate rear swaybar... and as expected, it turned out
crappy as a whole. or shall i say it turned out like a whole load of crap
by previous reviewers. and there was nothing else i could do other than
to swap out the entire system if i wanted to achieve the nice lowered
look.


No, the ET's do NOT make the car understeer more. the car turns
very well even in the rain with crappy tires like my Ziex912's. you can
use crap tires and yet get decent performance from the ET's. im not sure
if that is the same on the Basic's... as mentioned above, TEIN's philosophy
seems to demand more tire traction.

RiftsWRX is running even higher front spring rate (6K vs 5K) on his ET
setup than mine cause he claimed his car's rear was loose.

for auto-x application you may want to get the rear swaybar not
because of understeer, but with the open diff the inner front tire
starts to lift off the ground while turning rather than plant more torque.
so you can imagine how well the car is turning with the ET's. i recommend
you run +55 offset (stock) if you run the rear swaybar to minimize the
unnatural feedback you get through the steering wheel.

another thing i want to point out is the lack of ABS noise since running
the ET's. even on the stock setup i remember feeling the ABS noise
pretty frequently while driving spiritedly. the ABS noise is just another
way to gauge how well your tires are planted to the ground going
through different dynamic cg changes. the smoother and more
dynamically the car is riding, the less noise you get.

 


Quick Reply: Enduratech Coilovers



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:40 AM.