Fit Photos & Videos Threads for displaying photos and videos of the Honda Fit/Jazz

I.M.TURBOED: 175.7Hp/192.5Nm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 08-30-2008 | 10:17 AM
jtanoyo1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 165
From: Jakarta, Indonesia
I.M.TURBOED: 175.7Hp/192.5Nm

Hey guys,

After leaving my car in hiatus for months since I got my other ride (a JDM STi), I thought it's time to give it some love. I got a custom turbo kit made for the car using IHI turbo and custom piping+intercooler. I use dual BOV system with Blitz and a bov from a mitsubishi evo III to bleed the boost. The problem with the vtec engine is that it likes to make boost spikes (up to 0.7 bar sometimes! Yikes!) and I need the second evo III bov rerouted to the intake in order to "leak" some of the boost out. On the dyno, I got a nice 0.5 bar tapering down to 0.4 bar all the way to redline. Nice and safe for daily use, especially since I am on CVT. After tuning with a Dastek Unichip, I got a final number of 175.7hp and 192.5Nm torque at the CRANK. So at the engine, you can probably minus that by 25-30%. I don't really care for numbers anyway, because this car will never break any land speed records. I put the turbo on because this jazz is my road warrior and it'd be nice to give it a little oomph. On first impression, the car does feel a little "light" and "spirited". It's nothing like my STi of course (which is a pure track car compared to the jazz) but my butt dyno feels great. Car feels nimbler, accelerates faster and in general feels like an overall bigger hp car.

Here are the pics:

Looks almost stock!



Here's the dual bov system, blitz on top and the evo 3 bov right by the intake



Peekaboo! I had to make a custom bumper grill but I spray painted it black to make it more stealthy....



Pivot boost gauge and apex'i turbo timer in a custom pod



All lighted up....blang blang...



And for you dyno worshippers....Look at how linear the graph is (I hate dynos...)

Torque chart:



Hp chart:

 
  #2  
Old 08-30-2008 | 10:23 AM
Black01's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,098
From: VA
Waste of money IMO. Honda fit is not a race car or was not built for racing.
 
  #3  
Old 08-30-2008 | 10:28 AM
redrumm's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,534
From: wagovan
Originally Posted by Black01
Waste of money IMO. Honda fit is not a race car or was not built for racing.
not a waste of money. this car should have been made with more ballz.

nice numbers!! didnt you have work equips??
 
  #4  
Old 08-30-2008 | 10:36 AM
jtanoyo1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 165
From: Jakarta, Indonesia
Originally Posted by Black01
Waste of money IMO. Honda fit is not a race car or was not built for racing.
Exactly my point. That's why the whole project only cost me around $1500. For a +50hp gain, that's cheap.

Now if I'd be dropping a K20A engine with built internals, TH400 transmission, full turbo and fuel system setup totalling to over $25,000 in investment, then I'd be crazy.
 
  #5  
Old 08-30-2008 | 10:37 AM
niko3257's Avatar
FitFreak GE8 DIY Guy
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,929
From: Palm Coast FLA
5 Year Member
looks very good. nice and clean under the hood also.
 
  #6  
Old 08-30-2008 | 10:37 AM
jtanoyo1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 165
From: Jakarta, Indonesia
Originally Posted by redrumm
not a waste of money. this car should have been made with more ballz.

nice numbers!! didnt you have work equips??
I did. The +10 offset was too much for me, so I went to Advan RGIIs. I am getting old.
 
  #7  
Old 08-30-2008 | 10:41 AM
jtanoyo1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 165
From: Jakarta, Indonesia
Originally Posted by niko3257
looks very good. nice and clean under the hood also.
LOL did I sense sarcasm? There was 1/2" of dust under the hood from being in the shop for so long. The car badly needs some cleaning up.
 
  #8  
Old 08-30-2008 | 10:41 AM
redrumm's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (21)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,534
From: wagovan
Originally Posted by jtanoyo1
I did. The +10 offset was too much for me, so I went to Advan RGIIs. I am getting old.
haha yeah i bet it was.
looks good though and good job on the build
 
  #9  
Old 08-30-2008 | 11:30 AM
kelsodeez's Avatar
UNBANABLE
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,548
From: Af-BAN-istan
5 Year Member
very nice numbers but where are the other sheets? id like to see what your air to fuel ratio is.
 
  #10  
Old 08-30-2008 | 11:35 AM
jtanoyo1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 165
From: Jakarta, Indonesia
That's all I got bro. I wasn't even there during the dyno session. Like I said, I am not a dyno-sheet kinda guy. All I know is the car runs great and it gets me home without blowing up hahaa....
 
  #11  
Old 08-30-2008 | 11:39 AM
Raaaaaaaaaay.'s Avatar
Posts in the NUUDE
Retired Moderator
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,956
From: Orlando, FL
Takes more time to blow a motor then just driving home.
The numbers are nice.
 
  #12  
Old 08-30-2008 | 11:52 AM
jtanoyo1's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 165
From: Jakarta, Indonesia
Originally Posted by I Am Ray.
Takes more time to blow a motor then just driving home.
The numbers are nice.
I know....it was a joke.

On a more serious note, Dastek dynos don't provide any other info to their customers other than these 2 sheets. It's something "proprietary", they say.
 
  #13  
Old 08-30-2008 | 11:58 AM
Raaaaaaaaaay.'s Avatar
Posts in the NUUDE
Retired Moderator
iTrader: (11)
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,956
From: Orlando, FL
If they didnt put a wideband in the exhaust before the dyno no AF's were recorded.
Kinda sucks. You dont know if your car is running lean or not.

Buy a wideband.

Judging by the power and torque, Id say youre fine.
 
  #14  
Old 08-30-2008 | 11:59 AM
kelsodeez's Avatar
UNBANABLE
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,548
From: Af-BAN-istan
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by I Am Ray.

Buy a wideband.

.
i second that. its better to be safe than sorry.
 
  #15  
Old 08-30-2008 | 11:59 AM
kelsodeez's Avatar
UNBANABLE
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,548
From: Af-BAN-istan
5 Year Member
btw, pics of the sti please
 
  #16  
Old 08-30-2008 | 12:18 PM
eldaino's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,705
From: North Carolina
Originally Posted by Black01
Waste of money IMO. Honda fit is not a race car or was not built for racing.
turboing your car does not mean that you want it to be a race car.
 
  #17  
Old 08-30-2008 | 01:16 PM
BoriJDMGD3's Avatar
Ihh IS Jaaaarome!
5 Year Member
iTrader: (5)
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,410
From: florida_PR
nice numbers man, i will like to see a video if it...
 
  #18  
Old 08-30-2008 | 03:46 PM
Black01's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,098
From: VA
Originally Posted by redrumm
not a waste of money. this car should have been made with more ballz.
Honda fit was made for fuel efficiency, an economy car and if you think this car should have been made with more power, then you bought a wrong car. If you go to Eco Fit forum, you will see how owners are trying to get the most gas mileage from their Fits. You will not see a special forum in Mustang, Camaro, even in 7th gen Celica or Civic Si web forum talking about fuel economy or how to save gasoline like fitfrreak.net. Peace!
 
  #19  
Old 08-30-2008 | 04:12 PM
kelsodeez's Avatar
UNBANABLE
iTrader: (10)
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 4,548
From: Af-BAN-istan
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by Black01
Honda fit was made for fuel efficiency, an economy car and if you think this car should have been made with more power, then you bought a wrong car. If you go to Eco Fit forum, you will see how owners are trying to get the most gas mileage from their Fits. You will not see a special forum in Mustang, Camaro, even in 7th gen Celica or Civic Si web forum talking about fuel economy or how to save gasoline like fitfrreak.net. Peace!

sigh, another misinformed individual. the eco forum is a joke. if you wanted better gas mileage you should have gotten a hybrid

with the fit, its not about having mass amounts of power, its about having enough power to where the car isnt balls slow. my car is built for taking turns and it does what i want it to well. other cars have alot of horsepower, but only go well in a straight line. i mean, having 98whp as opposed to having 165whp is a HUGE difference esp. in such a small, lightweight car.

please, if you dont have anything constructive to say, dont post.
 
  #20  
Old 08-30-2008 | 05:23 PM
Black01's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,098
From: VA
Originally Posted by kelsodeez
sigh, another misinformed individual. the eco forum is a joke. if you wanted better gas mileage you should have gotten a hybrid

Eco forum is a joke? Maybe to you. It is very helpful for other owners who want to save money on gas. Yeah I should have gotten a hybrid and pay 8k-10K more. Riiigght!

with the fit, its not about having mass amounts of power, its about having enough power to where the car isnt balls slow. my car is built for taking turns and it does what i want it to well. other cars have alot of horsepower, but only go well in a straight line. i mean, having 98whp as opposed to having 165whp is a HUGE difference esp. in such a small, lightweight car.
Ah personal opinion don't count. A lot of cars that has high horsepower can turn well if not better than the Fit.

please, if you dont have anything constructive to say, dont post.
I guess I can the same thing to you.
 


Quick Reply: I.M.TURBOED: 175.7Hp/192.5Nm



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:26 AM.