What did you dyno at?
#41
Update. My previous sheet was an e-dyno as previously explained (see post #25). I believe that it was done in second gear, though it could have been in third. I don't remember because it was it was e-dyno'd on or around 12/17/2013 after the tuning process was completed on 05/17/2013. I don't remember the temperature, altitude, or barometric pressure was. That having been said, below is my new dyno sheet from this morning.
The temperature was 87F, altitude was about 1200ft, and barometric pressure was about 29.75. This was done on a Dynapack here: Welcome: Xact Dyno. The (bottom) red line was the baseline and the purple line was after a little tuning. Both were done in fourth gear. The green and orange(?) lines were done in third gear. The final number of 108.809hp/97.61tq was achieved in third gear with the aforementioned conditions. I'll let everyone decide for themselves if the numbers are high or low, or power at the wheels or the crank or in my fairytale land.
The temperature was 87F, altitude was about 1200ft, and barometric pressure was about 29.75. This was done on a Dynapack here: Welcome: Xact Dyno. The (bottom) red line was the baseline and the purple line was after a little tuning. Both were done in fourth gear. The green and orange(?) lines were done in third gear. The final number of 108.809hp/97.61tq was achieved in third gear with the aforementioned conditions. I'll let everyone decide for themselves if the numbers are high or low, or power at the wheels or the crank or in my fairytale land.
#42
The Fit feels the exact same as it did yesterday. Dynos are kind of like ovens: some read high and some read low. Just because I bake something at 300° at sea level it will turn out differently if I bake it in the mountains. Even if I had done a few more pulls on the exact same dyno in the exact same location other variables have changed like engine temperature, outside temperature, humidity, and barometric pressure. Just because I make Xhp doesn't necessarily mean that another member with the exact same modifications with the exact same tune will make the same numbers.
#43
Update. My previous sheet was an e-dyno as previously explained (see post #25). I believe that it was done in second gear, though it could have been in third. I don't remember because it was it was e-dyno'd on or around 12/17/2013 after the tuning process was completed on 05/17/2013. I don't remember the temperature, altitude, or barometric pressure was. That having been said, below is my new dyno sheet from this morning.
The temperature was 87F, altitude was about 1200ft, and barometric pressure was about 29.75. This was done on a Dynapack here: Welcome: Xact Dyno. The (bottom) red line was the baseline and the purple line was after a little tuning. Both were done in fourth gear. The green and orange(?) lines were done in third gear. The final number of 108.809hp/97.61tq was achieved in third gear with the aforementioned conditions. I'll let everyone decide for themselves if the numbers are high or low, or power at the wheels or the crank or in my fairytale land.
The temperature was 87F, altitude was about 1200ft, and barometric pressure was about 29.75. This was done on a Dynapack here: Welcome: Xact Dyno. The (bottom) red line was the baseline and the purple line was after a little tuning. Both were done in fourth gear. The green and orange(?) lines were done in third gear. The final number of 108.809hp/97.61tq was achieved in third gear with the aforementioned conditions. I'll let everyone decide for themselves if the numbers are high or low, or power at the wheels or the crank or in my fairytale land.
#44
Thank you for the dyno plots! I have never been one to say or judge whether a dyno is considered 'high' or 'low' because it is irrelevant info (To me at least). The most important information is what is your base number and the number after tuning/modifications/etc. I noticed what looks like a 2-3whp & 4lb-ft of torque gain after tuning (In 4th gear) If you don't mind me asking, what did you tune to achieve those numbers?
I never got a baseline before beginning the tuning process. I based my gain off of the numbers posted by others of stock power between 85-87hp, though my 2007 Fit could have made slightly more or slightly less power. I have no idea what the guy did to get a little more power out of it though he did say "it was running a little rich". I didn't really pay attention because I wasn't expecting him to make any changes. I was just there to get it on a "real" dyno for comparison.
#45
I too find it irrelevant because dynos are also like scales (to weigh stuff): even though three scales are zero'd out, I can step on one and it will read 180lbs, the second will read 178lbs, and the third will read 181lbs. So how much do I really weigh?!
I never got a baseline before beginning the tuning process. I based my gain off of the numbers posted by others of stock power between 85-87hp, though my 2007 Fit could have made slightly more or slightly less power. I have no idea what the guy did to get a little more power out of it though he did say "it was running a little rich". I didn't really pay attention because I wasn't expecting him to make any changes. I was just there to get it on a "real" dyno for comparison.
I never got a baseline before beginning the tuning process. I based my gain off of the numbers posted by others of stock power between 85-87hp, though my 2007 Fit could have made slightly more or slightly less power. I have no idea what the guy did to get a little more power out of it though he did say "it was running a little rich". I didn't really pay attention because I wasn't expecting him to make any changes. I was just there to get it on a "real" dyno for comparison.
I shouldn't have used the word 'baseline' as that usually is a reference to the very first dyno run that is done, before any modifications are done. My apologies!
#46
No worries. I also am ignorant as to the answer for this question because I didn't tune it. I gave Vit Viper some money and a few weeks of driving the Fit like he told me to and about 25 FlashPro calibrations to bring it up to where the lower of the two 4th gear pulls were. I have no idea what all he tinkered with as I was careful not to touch anything because I have no idea what I'm doing (when it comes to tuning) and have no qualms so stating!
#49
For people wanting a list (horsepower/torque):
Previc93: 129/137 GD
MNfit: 223/177 GD
Koi: ~120/??? GD
5speedwonder: 112/105
hkjazz: 138/???
JDMxGE8: 84/77
fitted08: 100/102 GD
kirko: 99/96
DWils: 159/169 GD
unfit2compete: 116/101 GE
Rollerboots666: 101/98
Previc93: 129/137 GD
MNfit: 223/177 GD
Koi: ~120/??? GD
5speedwonder: 112/105
hkjazz: 138/???
JDMxGE8: 84/77
fitted08: 100/102 GD
kirko: 99/96
DWils: 159/169 GD
unfit2compete: 116/101 GE
Rollerboots666: 101/98
#50
I was waiting to see anyone comment on this but thanks for compiling and posting this up.
#51
Whaaaaaat, I never posted in here?! Well this is the only sheet I can still find...
112/104
Since then I have refined the tune and cleaned up a few maintenance things... My info is all around on here somewhere, but AEM CAI, IK-22, 91 oct, Weapon R Race header ceramic coated, Megan B pipe with Ciro Racing Cat, H-Fit Type M axle Back.... SO MUCH TIME tuning... I did have the first GD Flashpro LOL
112/104
Since then I have refined the tune and cleaned up a few maintenance things... My info is all around on here somewhere, but AEM CAI, IK-22, 91 oct, Weapon R Race header ceramic coated, Megan B pipe with Ciro Racing Cat, H-Fit Type M axle Back.... SO MUCH TIME tuning... I did have the first GD Flashpro LOL
#52
So I put my 07 on a Dynojet to see what my bolt-ons have done..
5 speed
Last station chamber intake
R18 civic throttle body w/spacer
Weapon R intake manifold
Weapon R race header
Megan mid pipe
Apexi SV axle back
Ralco light weight pulleys
Fidenza flywheel
103.87 whp at 6.24
96.04 torque at 4.76
I'm looking at about 120-125hp at the crank, not as much as Ide like but not terrible either with no boost.
5 speed
Last station chamber intake
R18 civic throttle body w/spacer
Weapon R intake manifold
Weapon R race header
Megan mid pipe
Apexi SV axle back
Ralco light weight pulleys
Fidenza flywheel
103.87 whp at 6.24
96.04 torque at 4.76
I'm looking at about 120-125hp at the crank, not as much as Ide like but not terrible either with no boost.
#53
Basically stock. Current mod list...
HFP axle back
Denso IK22 plugs
K&N drop in filter
Here's the results:
Can see that heat soak was an issue by the third run. All were done back to back.
Run Conditions:
Run 1 - 88 degrees F, 50% humidity, 1.06 correction factor
Run 2 - 90 degrees F, 51% humidity, 1.07 correction factor
Run 3 - 91 degrees F, 51% humidity, 1.07 correction factor
Guess that it's broken in
HFP axle back
Denso IK22 plugs
K&N drop in filter
Here's the results:
Can see that heat soak was an issue by the third run. All were done back to back.
Run Conditions:
Run 1 - 88 degrees F, 50% humidity, 1.06 correction factor
Run 2 - 90 degrees F, 51% humidity, 1.07 correction factor
Run 3 - 91 degrees F, 51% humidity, 1.07 correction factor
Guess that it's broken in
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cnordt24
Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning
5
06-21-2018 10:42 PM
explosivpotato
Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning
169
12-10-2014 01:39 PM
Previc93
For Sale / Want To Buy / Classified Ads for USED Fit Items
5
10-25-2013 12:53 AM
porkchop
Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning
120
06-20-2011 05:39 PM
chaplain2FIT
Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning
13
08-01-2009 02:03 AM