HKS Racing Suction Kit
#2
01-09-2007 | 02:50 PM
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 695
From: RGL M.E.
yeah iv seen it, i got the HKS SuperPowerFlow, but i like this Racing Suction better, but it wasnt in stock when i needed it. But I hear this has pretty good gains, I got a JDM by the way i think it will fit the USDM just get the 1.5L it will probably fit.
This intake is my next on the list. HKS RACING SUCTION
This intake is my next on the list. HKS RACING SUCTION
dats just way too much dinero for an intake, i just hope if and when i do get it, i get at least 7 HP out of it hehehe!!
#9
01-17-2007 | 04:57 PM
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 140
From: CA
yeah iv seen it, i got the HKS SuperPowerFlow, but i like this Racing Suction better, but it wasnt in stock when i needed it. But I hear this has pretty good gains, I got a JDM by the way i think it will fit the USDM just get the 1.5L it will probably fit.
This intake is my next on the list. HKS RACING SUCTION
This intake is my next on the list. HKS RACING SUCTION
HKS Super Mega Flow Reloaded Kit Honda Fit <font color="#FF0000">Free Shipping</font>
I am seriously considering this intake because of the price. Anyone on the forum that actually has pics of this intake installed? How were the gains?
#11
01-17-2007 | 05:19 PM
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 466
From: Oxnard, CA
from my experiance... HKS makes the worst filters, they flow like ass and they pass alot of dirt into the intake... they don't filter great. someone on the supra forums did a test with alot of filters and the HKS was the worst. and for that low price on that HKS super mega flow, you get what you pay for.
#12
01-17-2007 | 05:38 PM
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 466
From: Oxnard, CA
this is why HKS sucks at filtering...
http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/filters_test/1/hks.jpg
the test for power of many different filters on a supra..
http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/fil...t/2/index.html
HKS filtered the worst and made the least amount of power.
http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/filters_test/1/hks.jpg
the test for power of many different filters on a supra..
http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/fil...t/2/index.html
HKS filtered the worst and made the least amount of power.
Last edited by 805FitSport; 01-17-2007 at 05:40 PM.
#13
01-17-2007 | 06:01 PM
Member
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 695
From: RGL M.E.
this is why HKS sucks at filtering...
http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/filters_test/1/hks.jpg
the test for power of many different filters on a supra..
http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/fil...t/2/index.html
HKS filtered the worst and made the least amount of power.
http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/filters_test/1/hks.jpg
the test for power of many different filters on a supra..
http://www.mkiv.com/techarticles/fil...t/2/index.html
HKS filtered the worst and made the least amount of power.
#17
01-17-2007 | 11:18 PM
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 140
From: CA
HKS isn't that bad, IMHO.
from my experiance... HKS makes the worst filters, they flow like ass and they pass alot of dirt into the intake... they don't filter great. someone on the supra forums did a test with alot of filters and the HKS was the worst. and for that low price on that HKS super mega flow, you get what you pay for.
My experience is a little different. I've run an HKS Power Flow on my 1989 d16a6 motor for a little over 275,000 miles now (motor is currently at 340,000). I've tried different intake filters and got the same trap speeds if not lower. The motor still gets nearly 40mpg, has no signs of burning any oil between changes, and stills pulls a decent low 15 sec quarter mile (best was a 14.82, and this was at 225,000 miles). I clean the original two layer filter out when it is time for an air filter service, and just dry before re-installing.
So do you really think that if I ran a different filter for these past 15 years, my motor would make it tthis far without a rebuild? Who knows, all I know is that HKS is not as bad as you think.
#18
01-17-2007 | 11:33 PM
June 2007 1st Place Fit of the Month Winner
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,664
From: The Latin Pot
#20
01-18-2007 | 01:21 PM
Member
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 466
From: Oxnard, CA
Thanks for your input- I appreciate your opinion, as well as the supra owner's.
My experience is a little different. I've run an HKS Power Flow on my 1989 d16a6 motor for a little over 275,000 miles now (motor is currently at 340,000). I've tried different intake filters and got the same trap speeds if not lower. The motor still gets nearly 40mpg, has no signs of burning any oil between changes, and stills pulls a decent low 15 sec quarter mile (best was a 14.82, and this was at 225,000 miles). I clean the original two layer filter out when it is time for an air filter service, and just dry before re-installing.
So do you really think that if I ran a different filter for these past 15 years, my motor would make it tthis far without a rebuild? Who knows, all I know is that HKS is not as bad as you think.
My experience is a little different. I've run an HKS Power Flow on my 1989 d16a6 motor for a little over 275,000 miles now (motor is currently at 340,000). I've tried different intake filters and got the same trap speeds if not lower. The motor still gets nearly 40mpg, has no signs of burning any oil between changes, and stills pulls a decent low 15 sec quarter mile (best was a 14.82, and this was at 225,000 miles). I clean the original two layer filter out when it is time for an air filter service, and just dry before re-installing.
So do you really think that if I ran a different filter for these past 15 years, my motor would make it tthis far without a rebuild? Who knows, all I know is that HKS is not as bad as you think.