have u ever raced ur fit yet?
#101
Originally Posted by fshwcrs
The S2000 *is* a monocoque chassis, as is almost every car built today.
BTW, you are updating me on my views of what a monocoque is if you can explain this because I was under the impression that monocoque has always been one piece structures made of predominantly carbon fiber. I know in bicycle manufacturing the only frames that can be called monocoque are the carbon fiber ones that have been created as one piece, not put together with lugs. All aluminum bikes are welded so they don't count. Unless the word monocoque is used very lightly in the automotive industry.
Wow page 6!
Last edited by Occidio; 05-09-2006 at 01:44 AM.
#102
Lol, OK so I looked it up and it turns out we are both right, only in different ways.
In order to be called a monocoque the skin of the vehicle has to be able to provide strength and rigidity to a car.
What I was referring to in the picture of the F1 was a more pure form of monocoque where the body panels ie. the air dam, side pods and whole driver tub assembly are all one single piece without any welds. Without a doubt a "tub" monocoque is unequivocally stronger but both are monocoque.
I honestly had no idea spot welded frames were still considered monocoque but I can see where it does still act as one body.
You have enlightened me!
In order to be called a monocoque the skin of the vehicle has to be able to provide strength and rigidity to a car.
What I was referring to in the picture of the F1 was a more pure form of monocoque where the body panels ie. the air dam, side pods and whole driver tub assembly are all one single piece without any welds. Without a doubt a "tub" monocoque is unequivocally stronger but both are monocoque.
I honestly had no idea spot welded frames were still considered monocoque but I can see where it does still act as one body.
You have enlightened me!
#105
Originally Posted by aywwsd
1. only in autox where you can barely get out of 2nd gear. go try real circuit.
nurburgring s2000 runs 8.39
sti spec c runs 7.59
base sti run 8.24
evo ix 8.19
nurburgring s2000 runs 8.39
sti spec c runs 7.59
base sti run 8.24
evo ix 8.19
ADAC Zürich 24h-Rennen Nürburgring 05-08 May 2005
Pos 13 #114 Honda S 2000 <= Best S2000
Pos 14 #67 Subaru Impreza WRX Sti <= Best WRX/EVO
24h DUBAI - TOYO TIRE 24h, 11-13 January 2006, Dubai Autodrome
Pos 5 #53 Honda S2000 <= Best S2000
Pos 61 #35 Subaru Impreza WRX <= Best WRX/EVO
#107
Originally Posted by Paulo107
well for now, but need the FIT for reliabilty and the 240 to beat on
#108
Originally Posted by DubaiMatt
How about you try real racing instead of one lap wonders? Here are some race results to get you started;
ADAC Zürich 24h-Rennen Nürburgring 05-08 May 2005
Pos 13 #114 Honda S 2000 <= Best S2000
Pos 14 #67 Subaru Impreza WRX Sti <= Best WRX/EVO
24h DUBAI - TOYO TIRE 24h, 11-13 January 2006, Dubai Autodrome
Pos 5 #53 Honda S2000 <= Best S2000
Pos 61 #35 Subaru Impreza WRX <= Best WRX/EVO
ADAC Zürich 24h-Rennen Nürburgring 05-08 May 2005
Pos 13 #114 Honda S 2000 <= Best S2000
Pos 14 #67 Subaru Impreza WRX Sti <= Best WRX/EVO
24h DUBAI - TOYO TIRE 24h, 11-13 January 2006, Dubai Autodrome
Pos 5 #53 Honda S2000 <= Best S2000
Pos 61 #35 Subaru Impreza WRX <= Best WRX/EVO
#109
Originally Posted by mav
Stop humping fat ugly chicks, its bad for your brain.
Comparing the ASM S2000 to the HKS EVO is like comparing Alessandra Ambrosio to Oprah Winfrey.
First in its class.
50 entries, featuring Signal, C-West, Works, J's Racing, Cusco, Mackin, Tein and A&J is hardly a "handful of tuners", unless you failed math class.
Don't stick your foot in your mouth that often and you won't babble.
Comparing the ASM S2000 to the HKS EVO is like comparing Alessandra Ambrosio to Oprah Winfrey.
First in its class.
50 entries, featuring Signal, C-West, Works, J's Racing, Cusco, Mackin, Tein and A&J is hardly a "handful of tuners", unless you failed math class.
Don't stick your foot in your mouth that often and you won't babble.
and comparing asm s2000 to the hks evo is like comparing fastest s2k to the fastest evo that ran on the track. hks evo might be the overweight rich talk show host, it still won.
first in it's class? whats that? 2 liter n/a? so civics and miatas? but gets it's ass handed by sti/evo left and right?
in the end, you still lose.
#110
Originally Posted by mav
1. And the Porsche Carrera GT beats your precious STi and EVO with a time of 7.32. Your point? Oh wait, you don't have one.
2. See my last meaningless post to counter your meaningless post.
3. I've dyno'ed my own S2000. I have no problem running my F20C to 9K RPMs to achieve power.
4. Sure fooled me. For second, I thought you're a NASCAR hillbilly.
5. Wrong. The S2000 is being renewed for another year - MY2007. Suzuka Blue and Sebring Silver are both dropped, and Grand Prix White / Tan is being replaced with GPW / Red and Black. Since you work for a Honda dealer and this has already been announced by the network for some time, I'm surprised that you didn't know. Or perhaps you're the typical car sales guy? The type that talks a lot of shit but doesn't know anything about the product hes selling. And the heritage that I am referring to is Honda's racing heritage in general, not the S2000's.
2. See my last meaningless post to counter your meaningless post.
3. I've dyno'ed my own S2000. I have no problem running my F20C to 9K RPMs to achieve power.
4. Sure fooled me. For second, I thought you're a NASCAR hillbilly.
5. Wrong. The S2000 is being renewed for another year - MY2007. Suzuka Blue and Sebring Silver are both dropped, and Grand Prix White / Tan is being replaced with GPW / Red and Black. Since you work for a Honda dealer and this has already been announced by the network for some time, I'm surprised that you didn't know. Or perhaps you're the typical car sales guy? The type that talks a lot of shit but doesn't know anything about the product hes selling. And the heritage that I am referring to is Honda's racing heritage in general, not the S2000's.
2. indeed one meaningless post deserve another. kinda like you comparing the porsche gt to my sti, yet wont compare your s2000 to my sti.
3. really, did you dyno it?? did you really achieve power at 9k? since when is 19x whp and 130 lb ft of torque achieving power?? i have 270whp and 300 lb ft of torque, 1000 bucks worth of mods, at 4000rpm until redline.
4. really? i'd figuared you to be a braindead idiot, trying to pretend s2000 as the best sports car at the price range.
5. wrong. nothing's been confirmed, last official notice was s2000 being discontinued 2006, as long as the xga starts production. i have dealer insider memos, you have google search engine.
and honda got great racing hertiage, too bad s2000 wasnt involved, as it have nothing.
#111
Originally Posted by fshwcrs
The S2000 was on Car and Driver's Ten Best list for 2000 through 2002 and 2004.
The F20C engine won the International Engine of the Year award in the "1.8 to 2 liter" size category for five years from 2000 through 2004.
The S2000 was voted as the #1 sports car and #1 car overall in the 2004 and 2005 Top Gear viewer survey. It was also voted the most 'loved' car - this award also depends on reliability ratings.
The S2000 was the highest-ranked model in the J.D. Power 2004 Vehicle Dependability Study's "Premium Sports Car" class (covering 2001 models). It consistently holds one of the top three positions.
So what awards has your Impreza won, awysd?
world rally champion manufacturers' championship 1995, 1996, 1997
driver individual champioinship 2003, 2001, 1995
group n winner 2004, 2005
2005 solo2 scca winner in stu
2005 scca t2 winner
jaf super taikyu winner in 2004, 2005
no one cares how magazine rates cars, ford focus won car n driver top 10 five times, go sell your s2000 for the focus.
#112
Originally Posted by aywwsd
how about you try to understand different groups and regulation. sti/evo have different regulation then s2000, and they dont even run in the same division group.
The EVO/WRX are in a "faster" class, but they cannot keep up... Does that annoy you?
#113
Originally Posted by aywwsd
i'll indeed stop humping fat chicks, but who will love your mother then?
and comparing asm s2000 to the hks evo is like comparing fastest s2k to the fastest evo that ran on the track. hks evo might be the overweight rich talk show host, it still won.
first in it's class? whats that? 2 liter n/a? so civics and miatas? but gets it's ass handed by sti/evo left and right?
in the end, you still lose.
and comparing asm s2000 to the hks evo is like comparing fastest s2k to the fastest evo that ran on the track. hks evo might be the overweight rich talk show host, it still won.
first in it's class? whats that? 2 liter n/a? so civics and miatas? but gets it's ass handed by sti/evo left and right?
in the end, you still lose.
Doesn't matter, different class of cars.
In its category and thats the roadster category if you haven't already figured it out yet, its the best. And the S2000 gets its ass handed to it by an overglorified ecobox? Since when? Is that how you explain why the S2000 beats them constantly in auto-x?
Lost? What have I lost? Last I checked, I still have all my real estate properties, my S2000 and M3 sitting in my garage and all my belongings. Although I do think I seemed to have misplaced my pen. Oh darn.
Last edited by mav; 05-10-2006 at 07:52 AM.
#115
Originally Posted by aywwsd
1. other then the porsche cost about 500,000. while the s2000 cost about the same as my no hertiage, no history, no vtec, but still beats your s2000 ecobox.
2. indeed one meaningless post deserve another. kinda like you comparing the porsche gt to my sti, yet wont compare your s2000 to my sti.
3. really, did you dyno it?? did you really achieve power at 9k? since when is 19x whp and 130 lb ft of torque achieving power?? i have 270whp and 300 lb ft of torque, 1000 bucks worth of mods, at 4000rpm until redline.
4. really? i'd figuared you to be a braindead idiot, trying to pretend s2000 as the best sports car at the price range.
5. wrong. nothing's been confirmed, last official notice was s2000 being discontinued 2006, as long as the xga starts production. i have dealer insider memos, you have google search engine.
and honda got great racing hertiage, too bad s2000 wasnt involved, as it have nothing.
2. indeed one meaningless post deserve another. kinda like you comparing the porsche gt to my sti, yet wont compare your s2000 to my sti.
3. really, did you dyno it?? did you really achieve power at 9k? since when is 19x whp and 130 lb ft of torque achieving power?? i have 270whp and 300 lb ft of torque, 1000 bucks worth of mods, at 4000rpm until redline.
4. really? i'd figuared you to be a braindead idiot, trying to pretend s2000 as the best sports car at the price range.
5. wrong. nothing's been confirmed, last official notice was s2000 being discontinued 2006, as long as the xga starts production. i have dealer insider memos, you have google search engine.
and honda got great racing hertiage, too bad s2000 wasnt involved, as it have nothing.
2. Whats there to compare? One is a roadster and the other is a rally car. All I see is a lot of differences and no similarities.
3. Actually mine made 200 RWHP on the dyno, in stock form and is currently at 235 RWHP with $7K worth of power mods. I have a friend who is running a turbo in his S2000, producing over 300 RWHP.
4. It is the best in its category, you ignorant hillbilly.
5. Dealer insider memos? Then obviously you must have failed reading class in second grade. I guess thats why you working as a lowly salesman in a car dealership. I advise you to go fetch your internal 2007 S2000 color chart and read. All the dealers should have received it by now. And XGA is only a rumor, no reality. I have a friend who also happens to be a high level executive at AHM, and you should stop reading vtec.net so much.
X-frame chassis and its high revving engine are a direct result of its racing heritage. You should go read your own sales brochures more often. Oh wait you failed second grade reading, nevermind.
Last edited by mav; 05-10-2006 at 07:58 AM.
#116
Originally Posted by aywwsd
no one cares how magazine rates cars, ford focus won car n driver top 10 five times, go sell your s2000 for the focus.
#117
Originally Posted by mav
X-frame chassis and its high revving engine are a direct result of its racing heritage.
Go to your nearest autox that S2000 and Evo/Sti regularly runs and see for yourself how the cars performs. I can't say, and even if i do, i know i'll just get discredited by someone else.
#118
And don't get me wrong, I like the STi, although I'm not too sure about the new 06 look. Nevertheless, I considered getting one as a daily driver but decided on the M3 instead because of the luxury features. The STi is a great car, just hard to compare it to an S2000.
As for the EVO, well the performance is undeniable but any car based on the POS Lancer and made by MitSHITbishi won't get too much attention from me.
As for the EVO, well the performance is undeniable but any car based on the POS Lancer and made by MitSHITbishi won't get too much attention from me.
#119
Originally Posted by DubaiMatt
Those results are WITHOUT any groups, those are the overall positions. How about you try to understand that?
The EVO/WRX are in a "faster" class, but they cannot keep up... Does that annoy you?
The EVO/WRX are in a "faster" class, but they cannot keep up... Does that annoy you?
#120
Originally Posted by mav
Oh well, my mother is a bitch anyways.
Doesn't matter, different class of cars.
In its category and thats the roadster category if you haven't already figured it out yet, its the best. And the S2000 gets its ass handed to it by an overglorified ecobox? Since when? Is that how you explain why the S2000 beats them constantly in auto-x?
Lost? What have I lost? Last I checked, I still have all my real estate properties, my S2000 and M3 sitting in my garage and all my belongings. Although I do think I seemed to have misplaced my pen. Oh darn.
Doesn't matter, different class of cars.
In its category and thats the roadster category if you haven't already figured it out yet, its the best. And the S2000 gets its ass handed to it by an overglorified ecobox? Since when? Is that how you explain why the S2000 beats them constantly in auto-x?
Lost? What have I lost? Last I checked, I still have all my real estate properties, my S2000 and M3 sitting in my garage and all my belongings. Although I do think I seemed to have misplaced my pen. Oh darn.
and in auto x, s2000 dont own anything. evo/sti vs s2000 is a driver's race. take it any track/road course, and watch the s2000 get it's ass handed.
as for what you lost... how about common sense? s2000 best performing car for the price range. lay off the crack pipe.
p.s. last time i checked, a cardboard box next to a pay phone, your dad's car, doesnt make you any successful.
Last edited by aywwsd; 05-10-2006 at 05:17 PM.