2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.

A WARNING about SNOW TRACTION on your Fit

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-29-2012 | 03:22 PM
SevereService's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 218
From: New York, New York
A WARNING about SNOW TRACTION on your Fit

The Dunlops and the Yokohamas both did fairly well on snow. However, if the tires get worn down enough then they will not have any traction on the snow.

Today, we had a minor snowstorm and I have the Yokohama AVID Envigors on my Fit. These tires are now worn down to the bands. I had ZERO traction in the snow. Hey I know I should have replaced the tires by now, but in this economy I cant afford to simply replace a set of tires.

So, to be clear, using a tire tread depth gauge you can find at Autozone. 11/32nds is new, 6/32nds is the limit at which snow traction is compromised, 4/32nds is where rain traction is compromised, 2/32nds is the absolute limit where a tire needs to be replaced.
 
  #2  
Old 12-29-2012 | 04:57 PM
DiamondStarMonsters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,428
From: Chicago, Illinois
5 Year Member
This just in.. bald tires perform poorly in adverse weather! More at 11!
 
  #3  
Old 12-29-2012 | 06:31 PM
fujisawa's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,656
From: Boston, MA
5 Year Member
I thought that too, then I realized OP made an effort to provide some exact information. Somewhat influenced by opinion rather than fact, since another person's "compromised traction" could be different. Overall, though, interesting.

But...
Originally Posted by SevereService
in this economy I cant afford to simply replace a set of tires.
Hope you can afford your insurance deductible ... tires are the #1 piece of safety equipment on the car.
 
  #4  
Old 12-29-2012 | 06:48 PM
Sloppy_Snood's Avatar
Member
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 70
From: Indiana
 
  #5  
Old 12-29-2012 | 06:51 PM
xxryu139xx's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (1)
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,354
From: Union, NJ
Trololol?!
 
  #6  
Old 12-29-2012 | 06:53 PM
micven55's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 87
From: Syracuse, NY
News, any non M&S tire used in more than a couple of inches of snow will be useless.
 
  #7  
Old 12-29-2012 | 08:43 PM
mike410b's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 7,565
From: .
5 Year Member
I had bald tires on my Civic. I drove it in snow.

I NO SCARE.
 
  #8  
Old 12-29-2012 | 09:03 PM
malraux's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 1,302
From: Louisville
Probably shouldn't have burned all that money on transmission changes. Did you ever find the transmission filter?
 
  #9  
Old 12-30-2012 | 12:56 PM
Red 05's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 1,106
From: Tuscaloosa
5 Year Member
Few years back I drove my Fit through town after an ice storm put about an inch of ice down and shut the whole town down. It wasn't exactly fast seeing as I was doing between 15 and 20, but I had complete control the entire time. Only time I didn't was when I stomped down hard on the brakes to see how well the ABS could handle ice. Pretty well, I'll say.
 
  #10  
Old 12-30-2012 | 04:13 PM
specboy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,462
From: Vermont
FOX News Reporting in: One of our most trusted corespondents has just reported that tires with no tread do not perform well in snow. I repeat, tires unsafe to drive in most any condition are also unsafe to drive in snow.

You heard it here first Folks.

Coming up next: Blown headlight bulbs hinder nighttime visibility and Engines without coolant tend to overheat.

... Back to you Bill.

~SB
 
  #11  
Old 12-30-2012 | 05:28 PM
hayden's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 1,899
From: tx
No you guys, it's the car's fault!
 
  #12  
Old 12-30-2012 | 06:43 PM
SevereService's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 218
From: New York, New York
Just posting this for someone's benefit. There hasnt been a lot of snow around here in quite a while and so I thought I could make it that much more on the same old tires, but then a mild storm came and it was very dangerous.

When I had some tread left, the Fit performed better then expected in the snow. I was able to move with ease through an unplowed street with about an inch, but now is a different story.

Im getting the Yokohama Envigors again mainly because I already have one in the garage so I just needed to order three. Next time around Im getting the Yoko Ascends. The Envigors got me 42000 miles which is much better than the stock Dunlops and all my driving is more or less urban cycle. So the Ascends would give me 60,000 miles if I do the Algebra correct.

Yeah, I know Im risking safety vs cost, but I didnt see this snow storm coming.
 
  #13  
Old 12-30-2012 | 08:11 PM
specboy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,462
From: Vermont
Well, that Weather channel and other news sources can be kind of tricky... Especially with that new-fangled radar. The internets tend to get in the way too... Both of them.

...Sheesh

By the way, that's not Algebra, it's basic equation solving. Don't think it even qualifies as pre-algebra.

This is just one mis-informed and bad "public service" announcement after another...

on the obvious but more serious side, Lowering your credibility by posting ignorant things won't benefit anyone.

~SB
 
  #14  
Old 12-30-2012 | 09:35 PM
fujisawa's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 1,656
From: Boston, MA
5 Year Member
Why does this always happen? This is stupid.
 
  #15  
Old 12-31-2012 | 02:59 AM
DiamondStarMonsters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,428
From: Chicago, Illinois
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by SevereService
. mean things where said, feelings where hurt
 

Last edited by MNfit; 12-31-2012 at 03:59 AM. Reason: Cleaning up
  #16  
Old 12-31-2012 | 07:42 AM
Schoat333's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 501
From: Brunswick Ohio
The Dunlops are terrible on dry roads. I never expected them to perform well in snow, even with new tread.
 
  #17  
Old 12-31-2012 | 10:33 AM
preludetofit's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 122
From: St. Clair County (O'Fallon)
Why did you post this...

/thread
 
  #18  
Old 01-03-2013 | 11:29 AM
nikita's Avatar
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 321
From: Running Springs, CA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by SevereService



So, to be clear, using a tire tread depth gauge you can find at Autozone. 11/32nds is new, 6/32nds is the limit at which snow traction is compromised, 4/32nds is where rain traction is compromised, 2/32nds is the absolute limit where a tire needs to be replaced.
California considers 5/32" the minimum limit for a "snow tire" (M+S) to be legal. Yes, 2/32 is still the legal limit for non-snow conditions. It has been icy here the last week and my street is steep. No one is able to get to the main highway with a 2WD vehicle without chains, regardless of tires.
 
  #19  
Old 01-03-2013 | 12:40 PM
Wafulz's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,897
From: Whittier,CA
5 Year Member
dam am i picky i change my tires every 1 1/2 years lol
 
  #20  
Old 01-08-2013 | 07:06 PM
Uncle Gary's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,421
From: Upstate New York
5 Year Member
In their defense, the Dunlops perform better in the snow than the Bridgestones do.
 


Quick Reply: A WARNING about SNOW TRACTION on your Fit



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:25 PM.