2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.

1 year of stats.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 06-13-2011 | 10:53 PM
AirborneRATT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 200
From: Bridgman, MI
5 Year Member
Cool 1 & 11 year(s) of stats.

Edit: 11 year update below.

I've kept track of my stats on every fill-up for the last year. Here is a brief run down.

Total miles driven: 11947.7
Total gallons: 310.4
Ave per fill-up: 9.4 gallons
Actual mpg: 38.47
Computer estimated mpg: 39.61
Ave. miles per $ of gas: 12.58
Ave. miles driven per day: 39.3
Ave. fuel price per gallon: $3.13
Ave. gallons used per day: 1.03
Ave. $ of gas used per day: $3.13
Ave days between fill-ups: 11

The average deviation from actual mpg versus the computer estimated is 1.14 gallons or 2.88% This is in line with what I read when I first bought the car.

I also kept track of the mpg with 87 octane and 89 octane and found *NO* difference in mpg so I am no longer spending the extra $$ for 89 octane.

Hope you find this insightful for your Fit.

I hypermile only mildly.

AIBORNE!!!

P.S. I have a base 2010 manual trans.
 

Last edited by AirborneRATT; 08-11-2021 at 01:48 PM.
  #2  
Old 06-13-2011 | 10:56 PM
Steve244's Avatar
Member
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,661
From: Georgia
5 Year Member
+ for posting. Thanks.
 
  #3  
Old 06-14-2011 | 02:11 AM
john21031's Avatar
Member
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 1,058
From: SoCal/Castaic
5 Year Member
Yeah, thanks for the post. You have done a lot of logging. Hope the results please you.

Do you regret not getting the sport model?
 
  #4  
Old 06-14-2011 | 02:37 AM
DiamondStarMonsters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,428
From: Chicago, Illinois
5 Year Member
It's going to be pretty tough to find a difference between 87 and 89 without a scan gauge. Do you have 93 available? Try some colder range plugs as well.

You will see a difference. I certainly do...


This is with me not being especially nice to it either. When behaving I routinely see more than 420miles on a tank if I run it down to to E line. But that is not good for the pump nor do I enjoy driving the slow.

Just something to think about before you write off higher quality fuel in a 10.4:1CR engine that relies on the knock sensor for spark advance.

Also there's more to the higher grades than just octane content. They tend to contain more upper cylinder lubes and detergents.
 

Last edited by DiamondStarMonsters; 06-14-2011 at 02:42 AM.
  #5  
Old 06-14-2011 | 04:36 AM
know-nothin's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 456
From: New England, USA
5 Year Member
+ reps for posting. Your mpg numbers are almost identical to mine. I also have a 2010 MT but it's the sport model.
 
  #6  
Old 06-14-2011 | 06:45 AM
Goobers's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 4,295
From: Wandering around.
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by DiamondStarMonsters
It's going to be pretty tough to find a difference between 87 and 89 without a scan gauge. Do you have 93 available? Try some colder range plugs as well.

You will see a difference. I certainly do...


This is with me not being especially nice to it either. When behaving I routinely see more than 420miles on a tank if I run it down to to E line. But that is not good for the pump nor do I enjoy driving the slow.

Just something to think about before you write off higher quality fuel in a 10.4:1CR engine that relies on the knock sensor for spark advance.

Also there's more to the higher grades than just octane content. They tend to contain more upper cylinder lubes and detergents.
420 miles?!?

I'm jealous! I barely break 300 when I go pump gas. Man, this delivery gig is killing me!!!
 
  #7  
Old 08-10-2021 | 02:04 PM
AirborneRATT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 200
From: Bridgman, MI
5 Year Member
11 years of stats.
Total miles driven: 130,183 and counting.
Total gallons: 3,370.9
Ave per fill-up: 9.29 gallons
Actual mpg: 37.95
Computer estimated mpg: 39.23
Ave. miles per $ of gas: 14.08
Ave. miles driven per day: 38.90
Ave. fuel price per gallon: $2.84
Ave. gallons used per day: 1.04
Ave. $ of gas used per day: $2.96
Ave days between fill-ups: 11.20

All in all, my stats have stayed steady from 1 year to 11 years. Slight differences but still very good. 5-spd manual.

I did have a motor mount break about 2 years ago and had the dealership do the 100k service too since it was at that point. I only just replaced my break pads and shoes at about 120k and did not need to replace drums and rotors. I also replace the rear shocks last year. I have a few plastic fasteners that I need to replace and will do that yet this summer. I just had a front airbag impact sensor go bad and am in the process of getting a replacement. I do most of my own work on the car which has kept the operating cost very low for me. I've paid a lot less on cars in the past but I've never had one be this inexpensive.
 
  #8  
Old 08-10-2021 | 07:14 PM
Pyts's Avatar
Member
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 1,252
From: Metro Atlanta, Georgia
5 Year Member
Color me impressed!
Your car has retained its efficiency across 11 years. I'm glad I trusted car and driver way back when. Now if Honda can put the XR650R back into production I'll be sold on the brand for life.

Thanks for the awesome records keeping! I'm sure everyone will be happy to see the positive remarks and data about their investment.
 
  #9  
Old 08-11-2021 | 08:22 AM
fit09's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 139
From: Harrisburg,NC
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by AirborneRATT
11 years of stats.
Total miles driven: 130,183 and counting.
Total gallons: 3,370.9
Ave per fill-up: 9.29 gallons
Actual mpg: 37.95
Computer estimated mpg: 39.23
Ave. miles per $ of gas: 14.08
Ave. miles driven per day: 38.90
Ave. fuel price per gallon: $2.84
Ave. gallons used per day: 1.04
Ave. $ of gas used per day: $2.96
Ave days between fill-ups: 11.20

All in all, my stats have stayed steady from 1 year to 11 years. Slight differences but still very good. 5-spd manual.

I did have a motor mount break about 2 years ago and had the dealership do the 100k service too since it was at that point. I only just replaced my break pads and shoes at about 120k and did not need to replace drums and rotors. I also replace the rear shocks last year. I have a few plastic fasteners that I need to replace and will do that yet this summer. I just had a front airbag impact sensor go bad and am in the process of getting a replacement. I do most of my own work on the car which has kept the operating cost very low for me. I've paid a lot less on cars in the past but I've never had one be this inexpensive.
Thanks for sharing your record keeping. Which motor mount did you need to have replaced ? Surprised rear brake shoes were replaced at 120k given the fact how little they come into play with these cars. Service limit is 1mm according to factory manual.
 
  #10  
Old 08-11-2021 | 08:30 AM
AirborneRATT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 200
From: Bridgman, MI
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by fit09
Thanks for sharing your record keeping. Which motor mount did you need to have replaced ? Surprised rear brake shoes were replaced at 120k given the fact how little they come into play with these cars. Service limit is 1mm according to factory manual.
To be honest, I only changed them because I had done the fronts and thought it was just good form to do the rears. I wasn't having any trouble with them.

I think it was the top mount on the passenger side? Not sure. When the engine dropped, it busted the timing chain cover too. A big mess and a big story involving my infamous local dealership. On the plus side, I contacted the factory and Honda covered $600 of the $1000 bill. 60% was paid by the factory on a car that was out of warranty.
 
  #11  
Old 08-11-2021 | 08:38 AM
fit09's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 139
From: Harrisburg,NC
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by AirborneRATT
To be honest, I only changed them because I had done the fronts and thought it was just good form to do the rears. I wasn't having any trouble with them.

I think it was the top mount on the passenger side? Not sure. When the engine dropped, it busted the timing chain cover too. A big mess and a big story involving my infamous local dealership. On the plus side, I contacted the factory and Honda covered $600 of the $1000 bill. 60% was paid by the factory on a car that was out of warranty.
Thanks for your reply. My 09 has about 177k miles and original mounts. Rear shoes original also at 2mm min thickness. Getting ready to replace them soon. Sounds like you were very lucky that Honda was willing to pay 60% of that bill.
 
  #12  
Old 08-11-2021 | 09:02 AM
AirborneRATT's Avatar
Thread Starter
|
Member
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 200
From: Bridgman, MI
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by Pyts
Color me impressed!
Your car has retained its efficiency across 11 years. I'm glad I trusted car and driver way back when. Now if Honda can put the XR650R back into production I'll be sold on the brand for life.

Thanks for the awesome records keeping! I'm sure everyone will be happy to see the positive remarks and data about their investment.
The thing is that I still work at the same place and live in the same place. One difference is that sometime after the first year, I installed a trailer hitch and bought a trailer from Harbor Freight that allows me to haul full sheets of plywood or drywall. I don't use it much but I do use it and it does take a toll on the car. Recently I hauled all of a concrete patio and front walk from my house to a place about 15 miles away. Took about a dozen trips to do. Immediately after rotated my tires and changed the oil to compensate a bit for the extra wear on the drive train.

Anyway, my point is that I don't do much different over the 11 years I've owned the car. The slight reduction in efficiency can be explained by my in frequent use of my car as a truck.
 
  #13  
Old 08-12-2021 | 02:52 PM
Breezer's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 208
From: Canada
Amazing.

I have never kept track of the fuel used in my vehicles, or motorbikes.
It doesn't help that I don't know how to convert liters, and kms, into mpg.
My last fill up was before a trip, so I filled up with the gas gauge still at half, took 23.17 liters, and had driven 288.4 kms. If anyone good at math wants to convert that into mpg, please do.
 
  #14  
Old 08-12-2021 | 04:10 PM
fit09's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 139
From: Harrisburg,NC
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by Breezer
Amazing.

I have never kept track of the fuel used in my vehicles, or motorbikes.
It doesn't help that I don't know how to convert liters, and kms, into mpg.
My last fill up was before a trip, so I filled up with the gas gauge still at half, took 23.17 liters, and had driven 288.4 kms. If anyone good at math wants to convert that into mpg, please do.
So 179.203 miles and 6.12 gallons equals about 29 mpg.
 
  #15  
Old 08-12-2021 | 04:39 PM
Breezer's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 208
From: Canada
Originally Posted by fit09
So 179.203 miles and 6.12 gallons equals about 29 mpg.
Thank you!

Feel that is very good considering it was mixed city, secondary roads, and hwy, with probably 95% of the time running the AC.
 

Last edited by Breezer; 08-12-2021 at 04:42 PM.
  #16  
Old 08-12-2021 | 04:55 PM
fit09's Avatar
Member
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 139
From: Harrisburg,NC
5 Year Member
Yes, that’s about what I get in my 09 Fit, automatic transmission with about 175k miles under probably similar driving conditions.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
WagovanMan
3rd Generation (2015+)
79
08-01-2015 03:23 AM
dgs
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
39
08-02-2009 09:25 PM
ralphch
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
10
04-20-2009 02:26 PM
kortnie
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
37
11-10-2008 04:33 AM
Tekki
General Fit Talk
11
06-30-2008 01:59 PM



Quick Reply: 1 year of stats.



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:38 PM.