Anyone here buy the "Base" model?
#43
10-19-2011, 06:07 PM
LOL. It's there...at the limit the car nose dives. I think the best way to reduce it is staggered tires (wider, stickier up front), front static camber, and playing with the spring rates front/rear to induce gradual oversteer.
#44
10-19-2011, 06:45 PM
I realize this is a really old post...but can somebody please explain the logic of how a thin RSB attached to the massive rear subframe is going to do anything at all? The rear suspension on the Fit is not independent...they are already connected via the massive swing arm. I just don't get how a thin RSB is going to do anything at all.
here's more.
#45
10-19-2011, 06:54 PM
Thanks for the link! Great info...especially this nugget:
Notice the location of the longitudinal cross beam on the Fit rear axle:
Vs. the CRZ:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
The longitudinal location of the cross beam controls important parameters of the suspension's behaviour, such as the roll steer curve and toe and camber compliance. The closer the cross beam to the axle stubs the more the camber and toe changes under deflection.
Vs. the CRZ:
#46
10-19-2011, 07:03 PM
Let's move the RSB discussion here...otherwise this topic will get lost in this thread.
https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/2nd-...ml#post1043177
https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/2nd-...ml#post1043177
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
