2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.

Modifications for lower RPMs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 12-15-2010, 01:28 PM
pianojosh's Avatar
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 5
Modifications for lower RPMs

Hello all,

I was wondering if anybody has done any modifications to get lower highway RPMs. My work commute is mostly highway, so the 3500-4000RPM cruise is clearly suboptimal.

Possibilities I've seen discussed are larger wheels, a taller final drive gear, or a complete set of new gears. Warranty voiding aside, has anyone tried anything like this? What were your results? Did MPG improve?

Josh
 
  #2  
Old 12-15-2010, 01:40 PM
Subie's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 2,334
Wow, those are pretty radical mods and not cheap unless you're a DIY guy... Wheels and gears combo depends on how much homework time you put into it. Don't know if you want to out-think those Honda engineers...

Cheapest and most direct way would be your right foot. Lift it a bit and rpm goes down, mpg goes up. Warranty stays intact.

Originally Posted by pianojosh
Hello all,

I was wondering if anybody has done any modifications to get lower highway RPMs. My work commute is mostly highway, so the 3500-4000RPM cruise is clearly suboptimal.

Possibilities I've seen discussed are larger wheels, a taller final drive gear, or a complete set of new gears. Warranty voiding aside, has anyone tried anything like this? What were your results? Did MPG improve?

Josh
 
  #3  
Old 12-15-2010, 01:42 PM
Committobefit08's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Posts: 1,423
Originally Posted by pianojosh
Hello all,

I was wondering if anybody has done any modifications to get lower highway RPMs. My work commute is mostly highway, so the 3500-4000RPM cruise is clearly suboptimal.

Possibilities I've seen discussed are larger wheels, a taller final drive gear, or a complete set of new gears. Warranty voiding aside, has anyone tried anything like this? What were your results? Did MPG improve?

Josh
Sounds like you bought a manual....one of the many reason I bought at auto (taller final gear).
 

Last edited by Committobefit08; 12-15-2010 at 01:44 PM.
  #4  
Old 12-15-2010, 01:44 PM
pianojosh's Avatar
New Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Cambridge, MA
Posts: 5
Should have clarified, manual transmission.

Highway speeds around here tend to be 75ish, so, that's more or less set.
 
  #5  
Old 12-15-2010, 02:01 PM
Subie's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: CA, USA
Posts: 2,334
Try cruising 65ish to 70ish. Driving habits, shift points, etc. are cheap mods too... Sorry, I just find it hard to complain about a Fit's mpg...

Originally Posted by pianojosh
Should have clarified, manual transmission.

Highway speeds around here tend to be 75ish, so, that's more or less set.
 
  #6  
Old 12-15-2010, 02:15 PM
reako's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: STL
Posts: 1,039
Originally Posted by Committobefit08
Sounds like you bought a manual....one of the many reason I bought at auto (taller final gear).
Yup, same here.
 
  #7  
Old 12-15-2010, 02:58 PM
Duymon's Avatar
New Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 2
Price we pay as manual Transmission guys. It doensn't really start getting loud until like 3.5 so I just stay a lil slower or I pump the music up more
 
  #8  
Old 12-15-2010, 03:23 PM
Eugene.Atget's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NYC
Posts: 285
I wonder how much you’d really save. You’re right that the RPMs are higher than they would be with a taller gear, but the engine needs less torque, and so less fuel is consumed with each revolution. Remember, horsepower is the product of torque and RPM, and you’ll need the same horsepower at a given speed on the highway regardless of RPM. The only savings you’d see with lower RPMs are from a slight reduction in inefficiency due to the energy required to draw the extra air through the engine. My guess is that the costs involved in the modifications you suggest would be higher than the fuel savings arising from reducing such slight inefficiencies over the life of the car.
 
  #9  
Old 12-15-2010, 04:09 PM
LLLC1393's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Syracuse, NY
Posts: 337
Originally Posted by pianojosh
Should have clarified, manual transmission.

Highway speeds around here tend to be 75ish, so, that's more or less set.
You can slow down and keep right without being a hazard. I see it all the time in New England. Even 65 would probably make a big and acceptable difference.
 
  #10  
Old 12-15-2010, 04:13 PM
Occam's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,222
Originally Posted by Eugene.Atget
I wonder how much you’d really save. You’re right that the RPMs are higher than they would be with a taller gear, but the engine needs less torque, and so less fuel is consumed with each revolution. Remember, horsepower is the product of torque and RPM, and you’ll need the same horsepower at a given speed on the highway regardless of RPM. The only savings you’d see with lower RPMs are from a slight reduction in inefficiency due to the energy required to draw the extra air through the engine. My guess is that the costs involved in the modifications you suggest would be higher than the fuel savings arising from reducing such slight inefficiencies over the life of the car.
Excellent point. I shall now drive my automatic locked in 4th, and my mileage should be the same. ;-)
 
  #11  
Old 12-15-2010, 04:24 PM
DiamondStarMonsters's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Posts: 4,424
Driver mod FTW
 
  #12  
Old 12-15-2010, 04:58 PM
niko3257's Avatar
FitFreak GE8 DIY Guy
5 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Palm Coast FLA
Posts: 1,929
I drive a lot of highway also and this thread makes
me happy i got an auto.
 
  #13  
Old 12-15-2010, 07:06 PM
Occam's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,222
My ex had a Nissan Sentra for a while (between minivans... she got tired of driving a minivan and looking like a mom... then decided she couldn't live without a minivan to haul crap around.)

Anyway, it was a terrific highway car because of the tall highway gearing. 2000 RPM at 70 mph, and there was no jerky downshift if you needed to ascend a grade or pass - just a smooth transition to a shorter ratio. It also had that soft, very French suspension thanks to its Renault genes (Wouldn't "Nevada" be an awesome name for a Renault car? Ahh, brain droppings everywhere), and a decently long wheelbase for a C-class, so it soaked up expansion joints with ease.

It was like a pint sized Buick!
 
  #14  
Old 12-15-2010, 09:20 PM
specboy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,462
If I remember correctly, the gearbox on the Fit RS across the pond has a 6MT for 2011 so finding someone who might be able to ship the gearbox over here might be another solution. The 5AT still has a taller top gear but it's closer from what I remember. PM 555SexyDrive as he might have more info on it.

~SB
 
  #15  
Old 12-17-2010, 02:57 AM
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 92
Originally Posted by specboy
If I remember correctly, the gearbox on the Fit RS across the pond has a 6MT for 2011


I agree with pianojosh - I want/have a MT and traffic goes about 75ish here. I have a 37mi commute (each way) and winding 3500+ to do 75 gets old. Is 3200 @ 75mph too much to ask?

Good point, not a great set of solutions. I want the 6MT !!!!
 
  #16  
Old 12-17-2010, 03:52 AM
Occam's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,222
I know it's and apples to oranges comparison, but when I traded my first motorcycle which ran at 9,100 rpm for one that runs at 5000 rpm at 70 mph. I got up to highway speed and though, "Holy Crap, it doesn't sound like I'm riding a hair dryer with handlebars!"
 
  #17  
Old 12-17-2010, 03:57 AM
Black3sr's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Kitchener,Ont Canada
Posts: 4,253
Originally Posted by pianojosh
Hello all,

I was wondering if anybody has done any modifications to get lower highway RPMs. My work commute is mostly highway, so the 3500-4000RPM cruise is clearly suboptimal.

Possibilities I've seen discussed are larger wheels, a taller final drive gear, or a complete set of new gears. Warranty voiding aside, has anyone tried anything like this? What were your results? Did MPG improve?

Josh
Leave home 10 minutes earlier.
 
  #18  
Old 12-17-2010, 08:25 PM
Vacca Rabite's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Dallastown PA
Posts: 89
For a car with an engine as small as the Fit, you really do not want to push it much past 65 if you are trying to save on mileage. Put on your cruise control at 65 and stay in the right hand lane. Even with the taller gearing in the AT Sport, there is a 4 mpg difference cruising at 75mph and cruising at 65mph.

The manual car not only has a shorter gear box, but it also has a bigger axle gearing. This make is more fun to drive at lower speeds, as it feels much more quick and responsive. But it also means you top out faster on the freeway.

Its only 1.5L, there is not all that much you can pull out of it.

Zach
 
  #19  
Old 12-17-2010, 10:51 PM
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Santa Barbara, CA
Posts: 92
I dont think PianoJosh was looking to compare and contrast obvious differences between the MT and AT, but just asking if there were any viable mods to optimize what he already has.

$.02
 
  #20  
Old 12-18-2010, 08:02 AM
specboy's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vermont
Posts: 2,462
The only viable mod is to change the gearbox. (or get a different car/auto)

Increasing the size of the tires will throw off the speedo/ODO and not make much of a difference unless you go extreme. To get a 500rpm drop, you'd have to go up to 185/70/16 from the 185/55's. This would increase the overall diameter by 2" and jack the car up one full inch. Tires that size might not even work and would likely rub on the inside in tighter turns. At that point, you'd also be driving an SUV and lose economy due to the extra weight of the tire and higher stance/wind resistance not to mention safety related issues being jacked up 1" and having such high sidewalls.

Long & short... this car is not a Highway cruiser in 5MT form.

~SB
 


Quick Reply: Modifications for lower RPMs



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:47 AM.