2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.

i feel like a {_dimsum} =[ lol

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 03-25-2010 | 03:55 AM
FitDEEZ's Avatar
Member
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,039
From: NJ
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by JDMxGE8
Why automatics are fun:
1. Makes driving in traffic easier
2. Makes driving uphill easier
3. You can hold you significant other's hand
4. No more having a hard time shifting while getting road head
i noticed this the first week with my car deffinatly a plus for AT
Originally Posted by koolkevin1107
Hit the nail on the head with #1. If you've ever driven in LA traffic, you know what I mean.
All the others are also bonuses.




Another hit on the head. I love my AT. Paddle shifters make it that much more fun. Ya sometimes i wish i got manual but after driving the car and i hit traffic, that goes away real fast. Plus with the way my car looks, i have NEVER gotten anybody tell me "dude ur car is gay its AT" cuz they STFU when i roll up slammed and boosted.
my paddles to the trick aswell , x2 for ridin slammed (soon 4 me )
 
  #22  
Old 03-25-2010 | 07:31 AM
know-nothin's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 456
From: New England, USA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by MNfit
the Evo X and GTR are hardly a normal auto tranny. They are basically clutch less MT. This is the future and if the Fit had a tranny like the Evo X it would be a different game.
"Clutch less MT?" No clutch = no MT in my book.

Disclaimer: I make no judgements about MT vs AT. Drive what you like and like what you drive but I scoff at the idea that a tranny without a driver operated clutch is a MT.
 
  #23  
Old 03-25-2010 | 11:34 AM
AnlDyxp_GD3's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,797
From: W. LA, CA
Originally Posted by know-nothin
"Clutch less MT?" No clutch = no MT in my book.

Disclaimer: I make no judgements about MT vs AT. Drive what you like and like what you drive but I scoff at the idea that a tranny without a driver operated clutch is a MT.
agreed. the clutchless-doo-dad may be cool, and faster than a M/T but its not a MT unless its got all the aspects of one.

To the OP, maybe you should have waited if you really wanted the MT. There was a member who was in your situation and I beleive they ended up paying more just to trade there AT in for a MT. goodluck!
 
  #24  
Old 03-25-2010 | 11:38 AM
JFit317's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 190
From: Indianapolis, IN
I feel like people get autos because they can't drive a MT
 
  #25  
Old 03-25-2010 | 12:47 PM
jookybanana's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 308
From: Victoria BC Canada
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by JFit317
I feel like people get autos because they can't drive a MT
exactly, and or when the car is shared other family members that cant drive manual, otherwise if someone can drive manual i'm sure they pick the manual over the auto, manual has so much more control over auto, faster and not to mention saves gas
 
  #26  
Old 03-25-2010 | 12:53 PM
JFit317's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 190
From: Indianapolis, IN
Originally Posted by jookybanana
exactly, and or when the car is shared other family members that cant drive manual, otherwise if someone can drive manual i'm sure they pick the manual over the auto, manual has so much more control over auto, faster and not to mention saves gas

::Thumbs Up:: good man
 
  #27  
Old 03-25-2010 | 01:11 PM
JDMxGE8's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 5,658
From: Temple City, CA
Originally Posted by MNfit
the Evo X and GTR are hardly a normal auto tranny. They are basically clutch less MT. This is the future and if the Fit had a tranny like the Evo X it would be a different game.
I thought they had dual-clutch manual transmissions.

Originally Posted by koolkevin1107
Hit the nail on the head with #1. If you've ever driven in LA traffic, you know what I mean.
All the others are also bonuses.
I definitely know what you mean. I live in Temple City, go to work in Downtown LA, go to school at GCC, then back to Temple City. There's traffic everywhere in LA.

Originally Posted by FitDEEZ
i noticed this the first week with my car deffinatly a plus for AT
Originally Posted by JFit317
I feel like people get autos because they can't drive a MT
That's not always the case. Before I got my GE8, my DB8 was my daily driver/touge/track car. I was doing repairs a lot because of all the stress that I'd put her through. So I decided to get a new reliable daily. I thought about getting the MT, but then I realized all the time I spend driving in traffic. Yeah... I'm glad I got the AT.
 
  #28  
Old 03-25-2010 | 01:41 PM
jookybanana's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 308
From: Victoria BC Canada
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by JDMxGE8
I thought they had dual-clutch manual transmissions.


That's not always the case. Before I got my GE8, my DB8 was my daily driver/touge/track car. I was doing repairs a lot because of all the stress that I'd put her through. So I decided to get a new reliable daily. I thought about getting the MT, but then I realized all the time I spend driving in traffic. Yeah... I'm glad I got the AT.
yeah, i think they are dual clutch, people are reffering it as cutchless for some reason

and i think it will depend on the person, cause i dont have a problem stuck in traffic in MT, while people are inching forward at the traffic lights, i just enjoy the wonders of MT, but AT will help especially if its a job to drive all day and deliver things, most company i know of cars will be AT
 
  #29  
Old 03-25-2010 | 01:41 PM
Heman's Avatar
New Member
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 10
From: where i need to be
i have had 4 cars before this that were all MT and i love driving a MT but i wanted an AT/DD that i could drive to work in trafic or on long trips to make it easyer, plus i still have MT toys to play with on the weekend
 
  #30  
Old 03-25-2010 | 01:56 PM
citabria7's Avatar
Member
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 405
From: Phoenix
MT is more fun, IMO, but an auto sure is easier in traffic going to work. Since I bought my base MT, been trying to get another Fit with Auto. Seems that whatever dealer I go to, they have the right car with the wrong tranny, or the right tranny with the wrong car. Finally gave up and will stick with one Fit.
 
  #31  
Old 03-25-2010 | 08:53 PM
Tork's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,251
From: Winthrop Harbor Illinois/ Presque Isle Wisconsin
Originally Posted by jookybanana
exactly, and or when the car is shared other family members that cant drive manual, otherwise if someone can drive manual i'm sure they pick the manual over the auto, manual has so much more control over auto, faster and not to mention saves gas
Yep, especially important in a low powered car like the Fit.
With a V6 or V8, auto trannys are fine by me.
 

Last edited by Tork; 03-25-2010 at 08:59 PM.
  #32  
Old 03-25-2010 | 09:14 PM
vinn's Avatar
Member
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,109
From: SoCaL
5 Year Member
Like Matt said, its best in traffic.

and number four, I have actually seen it in action on the 101N but in an EP3 Civic Si,
T_T
I did not know whether to give a thumbs up or not so I just turned away....
 
  #33  
Old 03-26-2010 | 12:17 AM
funks's Avatar
Member
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 31
From: Pleasanton, California
Originally Posted by know-nothin
"Clutch less MT?" No clutch = no MT in my book.

Disclaimer: I make no judgements about MT vs AT. Drive what you like and like what you drive but I scoff at the idea that a tranny without a driver operated clutch is a MT.
Hmm, the EVO X SST Transmission does have *TWO* clutches - it doesn't have a torque converter, nor is it CVT.

The only thing it doesn't have is a operator actuated clutch - the car's electronics does it for you. The fit is my daily driver so it had to be AT (California Traffic in general) but the sports car's I've bought over the years were all manual.
 

Last edited by funks; 03-26-2010 at 12:19 AM.
  #34  
Old 03-26-2010 | 09:48 AM
know-nothin's Avatar
Member
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 456
From: New England, USA
5 Year Member
Originally Posted by funks
The only thing it doesn't have is a operator actuated clutch - the car's electronics does it for you.
Adding clutch(es) and allowing the electronics (or even the driver) to operate them without use of the third foot pedal is a modified AT in my book. The the third pedal is really the main reason I drive a MT. All ATs allow you to manually change gears (and force the car to downshift or whatever) in one way or another. Over the years, the options have increased for those seeking an AT with a MT driving feel but I still consider all these cars ATs or hybrids.
 
  #35  
Old 03-26-2010 | 12:50 PM
shegetstodriveit's Avatar
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 214
From: KC
I enjoy driving MT, but I got the the fit with AT as I enjoy the convenience more. Has anyone bagging on the AT actually spent any time driving an AT fit in S and using the paddles? It's a nice experience!

The clutchless/dual clutch systems sound more like modified AT's, rather than modifying MTs (using an existing AT, change paddles to a shifter, and software to not let the trans automatically shift out of the selected gear- done!). I'm also thinking the auto companies are calling it a manual so they don't scare away buyers that don't understand the new technology.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bowkr
General Fit Talk
21
01-18-2010 06:53 PM
Edison Carasio
General Fit Talk
90
06-11-2009 04:56 PM
garseeahh
General Fit Talk
5
07-23-2008 08:48 PM
Solscud007
General Fit Talk
6
09-06-2007 03:48 AM



Quick Reply: i feel like a {_dimsum} =[ lol



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:28 AM.