Edmund's shifter critique
#1
Edmund's shifter critique
This is the 2nd report on our Fits' shifter. They say it's lifeless and ridiculously light in effort. Doesn't sound like mine. Yours?
Please feel free to comment in the blog and tell them they may have a defective shifter (or not):
2009 Honda Fit Sport: Arcade Shifter | Long-Term Road Tests Blog on Edmunds' Inside Line
Please feel free to comment in the blog and tell them they may have a defective shifter (or not):
2009 Honda Fit Sport: Arcade Shifter | Long-Term Road Tests Blog on Edmunds' Inside Line
#3
This is the 2nd report on our Fits' shifter. They say it's lifeless and ridiculously light in effort. Doesn't sound like mine. Yours?
Please feel free to comment in the blog and tell them they may have a defective shifter (or not):
2009 Honda Fit Sport: Arcade Shifter | Long-Term Road Tests Blog on Edmunds' Inside Line
Please feel free to comment in the blog and tell them they may have a defective shifter (or not):
2009 Honda Fit Sport: Arcade Shifter | Long-Term Road Tests Blog on Edmunds' Inside Line
I figured as my DD, if the shifter was going to feel that disconnected, may as well have the option of not shifting at all. The clutch feel didn't help either.
Again nothing wrong with it, didn't have issues driving smoothly, rev hang wasn't too bad, etc. It just didn't do it for me (if you like it awesome, very glad you're happy because I am too). The shifters that were in my bugeye WRX and my 2000 Special Edition Miata however, those were nice...clutches too.
It's actually my first car that hasn't been a stick. Surprisingly enough, I don't regret the decision.
Last edited by pilosopo; 05-28-2009 at 02:57 PM.
#4
Interesting. Maybe just like some Fits seem to have brake or headlight issues, there seems to be a divide with the shifter too.
I know others chimed in and counterpointed saying their shifter isn't that light and it's full of feel like mine. (thanks the man upstairs)
For example, going to an S2000's shifter, mine is on par with that as far as effort.
I know others chimed in and counterpointed saying their shifter isn't that light and it's full of feel like mine. (thanks the man upstairs)
For example, going to an S2000's shifter, mine is on par with that as far as effort.
#5
Interesting. Maybe just like some Fits seem to have brake or headlight issues, there seems to be a divide with the shifter too.
I know others chimed in and counterpointed saying their shifter isn't that light and it's full of feel like mine. (thanks the man upstairs)
For example, going to an S2000's shifter, mine is on par with that as far as effort.
I know others chimed in and counterpointed saying their shifter isn't that light and it's full of feel like mine. (thanks the man upstairs)
For example, going to an S2000's shifter, mine is on par with that as far as effort.
That thing was a gem, slick, wristy motion, precise mechanical feel, perfectly spaced gates... just an absolute gem.
The clutch was feelsome and perfectly weighted as well.
The Fits I drove, were neither of those things, in fact, I felt so disappointed after test driving the cars initially (both base versions. 2 different dealerships) I questioned why I wanted one.
Thankfully I test drove a sport, and the paddle shifters, rear roll bar, and better wheel and tire package were exactly what the car needed. Arguably as fun to drive as my Miata, far more practical and economical, and much safer to boot.
But the shift feel and clutch take up in the cars I drove were, IMHO, crap, and very much like as described by the Edmund's tester. Loosy, goosy, with seemingly no defined gates, and felt like stirring pudding. Clutch take up happened in the last degree of pedal travel,and was so light I could've breathed on it to get it to work.
Again I had no problems driving the cars smoothly, but compared to the buttoned down chassis the clutch and shifter seemed at odds. My auto, when the torque converter is locked up, proved more responsive and postive in response, shifting, and demeanor.
Last edited by pilosopo; 05-28-2009 at 03:48 PM.
#6
My Fit's shifter feels very direct and mechanical, you can feel it engaging through the gates. It isn't as connected as my Impreza's was, but I'd certainly say it has better feel than the average car, and I've driven dozens of manuals.
#8
I'll bet the Edmunds car is fine and they're being way too harsh. I think they had to write about something to make a story and they chose to trash the shifter for no good reason other than it's a very light shifter compared to everything else out there. I thought the shifter in our Mazda5 was light. After having driven the Fit for a month, the 5's shifter felt clunky and heavy.
Perhaps the Edmunds editor has some preconceived notion of what a shifter should feel like. A old Patrick Bedard column from years ago talked about how a Jaguar engineer tried to tell him how a a murderously stiff clutch was necessary to handle the massive torque the engine was spewing out. The argument didn't hold because Bedard had driven a 454 Corvette to the test site that had a lighter clutch.
The Fit shifts accurately, and yes, it's light, which some people may just not like. But I've driven (fortunately not owned) cars with impossible shifters, including a late 80s Dodge Shadow where you had to pray that you were in the correct gear, and a mid 90s Saturn that refused to slot into gear without a bang. In light of that, I'll keep my Fit, thank you very much.
Perhaps the Edmunds editor has some preconceived notion of what a shifter should feel like. A old Patrick Bedard column from years ago talked about how a Jaguar engineer tried to tell him how a a murderously stiff clutch was necessary to handle the massive torque the engine was spewing out. The argument didn't hold because Bedard had driven a 454 Corvette to the test site that had a lighter clutch.
The Fit shifts accurately, and yes, it's light, which some people may just not like. But I've driven (fortunately not owned) cars with impossible shifters, including a late 80s Dodge Shadow where you had to pray that you were in the correct gear, and a mid 90s Saturn that refused to slot into gear without a bang. In light of that, I'll keep my Fit, thank you very much.
#10
I have 3 Miatas and just bought the 09 Fit SPort and I love the Honda shifter...never have I felt such ease with a manual. All it needs is a heavy shift knob and possibly (just slightly) and short shift kit. My Miata's are more in line with the fun factor, but honestly - they are picking on the Fit's shifter?!
Edmunds is funny - they tend to praise shifters or quality that you find on a Dodge Charger or Ford Mustang or Pontiac Solstice...but when you have a billion dollar company like Honda provide a shifter that they are usually known for (the other being Mazda IMO), you just begin to wonder what they are smoking.
Let Edmunds not dictate your grin at the pumps.
Edmunds is funny - they tend to praise shifters or quality that you find on a Dodge Charger or Ford Mustang or Pontiac Solstice...but when you have a billion dollar company like Honda provide a shifter that they are usually known for (the other being Mazda IMO), you just begin to wonder what they are smoking.
Let Edmunds not dictate your grin at the pumps.
#13
To add...to me a Civic Si's shift action is lifeless - it clunks into each slot, lighter than our Fit's with much less feel. Feels cheap. Same goes for its clutch feel.
Yet I don't hear much criticism of it. Go figure.
Yet I don't hear much criticism of it. Go figure.
#15
and i too only drive MT cars mainly. the Fit's MT gearbox is fine and the clutch is light so even in heavy traffic it's no big deal. unless you're a car enthusiast, you're missing out on all the fun.
sometimes i wonder if Edmunds is becoming more like consumer reports.
#16
wow, i dont know about the miata cause ive yet to drive the 2000SE model, but the WRX bugeye? man, i had that car long time ago (2002 model) and that was pure example of a crappy 1970's linkage, crappy clutch.
and i too only drive MT cars mainly. the Fit's MT gearbox is fine and the clutch is light so even in heavy traffic it's no big deal. unless you're a car enthusiast, you're missing out on all the fun.
sometimes i wonder if Edmunds is becoming more like consumer reports.
and i too only drive MT cars mainly. the Fit's MT gearbox is fine and the clutch is light so even in heavy traffic it's no big deal. unless you're a car enthusiast, you're missing out on all the fun.
sometimes i wonder if Edmunds is becoming more like consumer reports.
Didn't have the DRL's that they were supposed to have, and compared to my friends that was purchased a few months later, hoses and stuff were routed differently in the engine bay.
My car also had a much, much better tranny than his so who knows? Was faster too.
Like I said, there's nothing wrong with the Fit's gearbox, my assesment of it is my own, and has no bearing on anyone else. I just personally didn't car for the one's I drove.
I'm definitely a car enthusiast just like most here, and it truly pained me that I really didn't like driving the stick. And as an enthusiast, I'm forever grateful to Honda that they were able to put such a wonderfully responsive automatic (for an automatic anyway, lol) gearbox into this little car that just about satisfies my fun to drive needs daily. Best slushbox I've ever used, though I guess that's because it's really only acting like one in first gear.
-edit- Do you like the shifter in your MINI? I drove my WRX to the dealer to test drive one when they came out, and I remember thinking how alike the two cars were for me in terms of shifting. Weird eh?
Last edited by pilosopo; 05-29-2009 at 01:23 AM.
#18
Go figure. Motortrend disagrees completely:
"The five-speed manual (a five-speed auto with paddles is optional) works better than units in cars costing twice the price; it flicks through its gates with a light touch and, even better, clutch take-up is syrup-smooth"
2009 Honda Fit Sport - Quick Test - Motor Trend
"The five-speed manual (a five-speed auto with paddles is optional) works better than units in cars costing twice the price; it flicks through its gates with a light touch and, even better, clutch take-up is syrup-smooth"
2009 Honda Fit Sport - Quick Test - Motor Trend
#19
Bite your tongue. I completely disagree with this statement being a current owner of a '96.
To keep this on track. The only thing I dislike is the rev hang in this car. I know, lift my foot off the gas earlier. I just hate it. If I could get rid of that, I'd love the car.
To keep this on track. The only thing I dislike is the rev hang in this car. I know, lift my foot off the gas earlier. I just hate it. If I could get rid of that, I'd love the car.
#20
Bite your tongue. I completely disagree with this statement being a current owner of a '96.
To keep this on track. The only thing I dislike is the rev hang in this car. I know, lift my foot off the gas earlier. I just hate it. If I could get rid of that, I'd love the car.
To keep this on track. The only thing I dislike is the rev hang in this car. I know, lift my foot off the gas earlier. I just hate it. If I could get rid of that, I'd love the car.
But if you don't like it, I guess the throttle controllers might be worth a shot.