2nd Generation (GE 08-13) 2nd Generation specific talk and questions here.

How come 2009 Fit mileage has decreased?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #21  
Old 10-12-2008, 06:30 PM
Arisenfury's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: CT
Posts: 1,398
Have you ever ridden a bike before? Think of how fast you can get the Bike up to speed if you start in the highest gear on the bike. Your feet are moving very slow to get the wheel to make one revolution. Once you get up to speed though the higher gear makes maintaining the speed much easier. Now think about starting in a low gear and going up to speed shifting the gears of the bike, you get there faster and with less strain. Now once you're at speed downshift the bike to the next gear or two down and pedal the bike so that it's still applying torque to the wheel to keep it moving at the speed you're going. It's going to take a lot more work and your feet are going to move much faster than with the taller gear. This same principle works for the gears of a car.
 
  #22  
Old 10-12-2008, 06:31 PM
jenhonski's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 97
Originally Posted by niko3257
the gear ratios have changed for manuals in 09
thus making the auto have more MPG

do a search on gear ratios
this has been discussed before. i even posted
a thread with actual speeds and rpms for both
mt and at trannys
niko3257 can you give me a little more info? I did a few searches but I couldn't find where you give actual RPMs. Did you list 08 ratios alongside 09 ratios?

2008 Honda Fit ratios are not the same between MT and AT. The MT 2008 has higher ratios than the 2008 AT. Futhermore, the 2009 Fit ratios are the same or less than the 2008 Fit (except for "Final Drive"). What is "Final Drive"?
 

Last edited by jenhonski; 10-12-2008 at 06:45 PM.
  #23  
Old 10-12-2008, 06:31 PM
IfTheFoo's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 260
Originally Posted by jenhonski
That sucks!

What's the advantage of higher rpms--just more torque? What exactly does this increased torque do for the driver?
Jenhonski, I'd encourage you to look some of this stuff up using search tools like google and wikipedia. You are asking lots of interesting questions, but please stop relying on someone to answer ALL of them for you. You've obviously got a 'net connection, well, the answers to a lot of "generic" questions (like torque, etc) can be found online. Not so with the '09 Fit in most cases - a lotta times we Fitfreaks ARE the answer since this is a new vehicle.. Not wanting to rag on you or anything, pls don't take it that way. Knowledge is a good thing! Curiosity is the next best thing. (OK that's hokey)
 
  #24  
Old 10-12-2008, 06:33 PM
jenhonski's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 97
Originally Posted by Arisenfury
Have you ever ridden a bike before? Think of how fast you can get the Bike up to speed if you start in the highest gear on the bike. Your feet are moving very slow to get the wheel to make one revolution. Once you get up to speed though the higher gear makes maintaining the speed much easier. Now think about starting in a low gear and going up to speed shifting the gears of the bike, you get there faster and with less strain. Now once you're at speed downshift the bike to the next gear or two down and pedal the bike so that it's still applying torque to the wheel to keep it moving at the speed you're going. It's going to take a lot more work and your feet are going to move much faster than with the taller gear. This same principle works for the gears of a car.
Oh, thank you so much for explaining that
 

Last edited by jenhonski; 10-12-2008 at 06:56 PM.
  #25  
Old 10-12-2008, 06:35 PM
jenhonski's Avatar
Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 97
Originally Posted by IfTheFoo
Jenhonski, I'd encourage you to look some of this stuff up using search tools like google and wikipedia. You are asking lots of interesting questions, but please stop relying on someone to answer ALL of them for you. You've obviously got a 'net connection, well, the answers to a lot of "generic" questions (like torque, etc) can be found online. Not so with the '09 Fit in most cases - a lotta times we Fitfreaks ARE the answer since this is a new vehicle.. Not wanting to rag on you or anything, pls don't take it that way. Knowledge is a good thing! Curiosity is the next best thing. (OK that's hokey)
Sorry

I was thinking there was a specific reason for more torque related specifically to the Fit.
 
  #26  
Old 10-12-2008, 07:01 PM
niko3257's Avatar
FitFreak GE8 DIY Guy
5 Year Member
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Palm Coast FLA
Posts: 1,929
Originally Posted by jenhonski
niko3257 can you give me a little more info? I did a few searches but I couldn't find where you give actual RPMs. Did you list 08 ratios alongside 09 ratios?

2008 Honda Fit ratios are not the same between MT and AT. The MT 2008 has higher ratios than the 2008 AT. Futhermore, the 2009 Fit ratios are the same or less than the 2008 Fit (except for "Final Drive"). What is "Final Drive"?

https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/othe...must-look.html


https://www.fitfreak.net/forums/eco-...9-fit-rpm.html


these are 2 threads on rpms and i think there is more but
i'm to lazy to search for more.
just look around you'll find all you need.
but if your really that worried get the auto and play it
safe.
i love my auto.
 
  #27  
Old 10-12-2008, 07:04 PM
IfTheFoo's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 260
Originally Posted by jenhonski
Sorry

I was thinking there was a specific reason for more torque related specifically to the Fit.
No prob, it's all good.
 
  #28  
Old 10-12-2008, 07:29 PM
mahout's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: NC USA
Posts: 4,371
Originally Posted by jenhonski
niko3257 can you give me a little more info? I did a few searches but I couldn't find where you give actual RPMs. Did you list 08 ratios alongside 09 ratios?

2008 Honda Fit ratios are not the same between MT and AT. The MT 2008 has higher ratios than the 2008 AT. Futhermore, the 2009 Fit ratios are the same or less than the 2008 Fit (except for "Final Drive"). What is "Final Drive"?

gear transmission final axle gear overall ratio

1st 3.308(2.996) 4.62(4.56) 15.28(13.66)
2nd 1.87(1.679) 4.62(4.56) 8.64(7.656)
3rd 1.303(1.067) 4.62(4.56) 6.02(4.86)
4th .949(.761) 4.62(4.56) 4.38(3.47)
5th .727(.552) 4.62(4.56) 3.359(2.51)

A vehicle generally has 2 means of reducing engine rpm to the rpm needed by wheels to cover ground. The first is the transmission which has several sets of gears selected by the driver (manual) or a computer (automatic), and the final drive which is a single hypoid gear between the transmission and the wheels that turn the rotation 90 degrees from engine to wheels. That gear doesn't change ratios conventionally.
The gear down from roghly 14:1 to 3:1 is necessary to let the wheels turn at say 600 rpm at 60 mph in fifth and 600 rpm at 20 in first.
The lower the ratio overall the less engine rpm is needed at any given speed. The automatic overall ratio is 2.51 to 1 compared to the manuals 3.36, which means at 6000 rpm the automatic would be able to go 180 mph and of course the horsepower required to move that much air out of the way is far beyond what the Fit engine has. The manual could reach 133 and can reach 115 mph.
We have tested both manuals and automatics and indeed can show the manual about 10 mph faster than the automatic.
However, since the automatic at 60 mph is turning the engine only 2200 rpm and the manual 2800 rpm at 60 mph, the automatic gets better gas mileage because the cylinders fill with fuel-air mixture much more often in the manual. The more times you fill the cylinders per mi traveled the more fuel you burn. But the of course the manual accelerates more rapidly and can reach higher speeds eventually.
PS torque is how much turning force is on a wheel; acceleration
horsepower is how much force turns the wheel per minute: top speed.
 

Last edited by mahout; 10-12-2008 at 08:01 PM.
  #29  
Old 10-13-2008, 09:48 PM
ccaddy's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: London,Ontario,Canada
Posts: 32
Lighter vehicles get better mileage .
The auto may weigh less (I haven't checked) then the 5 speed
due to it's replacing the spare with a pump and can of sealant (?)

- Craig
 
  #30  
Old 10-13-2008, 10:12 PM
FiveFreshFish's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Canada
Posts: 222
Originally Posted by ccaddy
Lighter vehicles get better mileage .
The auto may weigh less (I haven't checked) then the 5 speed
due to it's replacing the spare with a pump and can of sealant (?)

- Craig
The AT still weighs more, despite the repair kit.

Canadian weights (MT/AT) in kg from honda.ca:

DX - 1119/1151

LX - 1131/1163

Sport - 1147/1176
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Blackbeard
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
39
03-09-2015 10:44 AM
skyyye
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
11
08-19-2011 04:13 AM
gilkman1
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
7
04-29-2011 06:57 AM
TCMIV
General Fit Talk
8
02-06-2009 11:13 PM
MirrorWorks
General Fit Talk
53
06-17-2006 01:34 PM



Quick Reply: How come 2009 Fit mileage has decreased?



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:02 PM.