2nd Gen GE8 Specific Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning Sub-Forum Threads discussing engine mods/swaps/tuning for the 2nd generation GE8 Honda Fit.

who has the weapon r header ge8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #41  
Old 08-17-2010, 12:51 PM
bmxman's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Vancouver Island, BC
Posts: 894
If it didn't delete all the cats I would have it already but seems pretty contradictory as to what the Fit was designed for....I like clean air.
 
  #42  
Old 09-28-2010, 12:04 PM
blackndecker's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,316
I'm late to the party...

Originally Posted by Tork
Roam no more, I am linking this bad boy. This is a great topic!




and just to paint a complete picture, here is the stock Fit pre-cat and cat the above aftermarket parts would replace

Tork, great info...I know you're no longer around here...but thanks again

555-too-sexy or Lyon, maybe you guys can chime in here...is the close-coupled cat onverter considered the primary cat and the under floor cat considered the secondary?

Yeah I agree that going to a muffler shop may be the most cost effective solution at this time. I'm waiting for some dyno charts from WR. Another possibility, maybe we could write (collectively...power in #'s) and have Honda Tuning do a power pages on this piece. They have done a prior power pages on the Fit (CAI, pulley, IK22 plugs) so this wouldn't be unreasonable.

Alternatively, we could do this ourselves with the new Iphone app i posted up earlier. This app gives Hp, 0-60, 1/4, 1/8 ET, etc.

Honestly though, I am reaching a cost vs. benefit plateau with the Fit. Cracking the ECU limits me from really pushing forward. At this time, IK22 + lightweight pulley + CAI is the only dyno proven mods on the Fit (this is good for around 10 hp...dyno results are posted in "Biggest Loser"). Chris, er...555sexy...has taken weight loss pretty far and probably has the most performance oriented Fit on this forum. I'd like to see your 0-60 and 1/4 mile times...are you planning on getting the Iphone app?

I think my weight loss is going to peak around 160-170 lbs. Getting to 200 lbs is going to require $2,000 in CF buckets...or chiseling out the sound deadening panels.
I recently chiseled these out of my 2001 civic - the panels altogether weighed b/w 40-50 lbs:
Name:  Dryice.jpg
Views: 415
Size:  124.0 KB



And after a lashing with the wire wheel:
Name:  Wirewheel.jpg
Views: 472
Size:  106.0 KB
 
  #43  
Old 09-28-2010, 12:13 PM
blackndecker's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,316
Would disconnecting the rear O2 sensor (at the underfloor cat) throw a check engine light? I'd like to get the WR kit just for the first piece...then go all aluminum from there back...less expensive than titanium but equal or greater weight reduction.
 

Last edited by blackndecker; 09-28-2010 at 12:15 PM.
  #44  
Old 09-28-2010, 02:39 PM
Leets's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 313
Originally Posted by blackndecker
Would disconnecting the rear O2 sensor (at the underfloor cat) throw a check engine light? I'd like to get the WR kit just for the first piece...then go all aluminum from there back...less expensive than titanium but equal or greater weight reduction.
Yes, it would, but you could always weld a bung onto the pipe, use an antifouler, and then screw the sensor into that.
 
  #45  
Old 09-28-2010, 02:39 PM
Staff@WR's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South San Francisco
Posts: 341
Ok here you all go I didnt know this thread was created. Anyhow here is the dyno result when we got our final version. The dyno is OEM vs WR Header both of which are going through the stock cat back exhaust system. We do not have a check engine light because of our CEL Eliminator.

Name:  2010FitWRHeadervsOEM.jpg
Views: 411
Size:  85.7 KB
 
  #46  
Old 09-28-2010, 04:37 PM
blackndecker's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,316
Thanks for the dyno charts....those TQ gains almost seem too good to be true. Especially considering virtually every aftermarket exhaust available for the Fit causes an initial TQ and HP loss below 3500-4000 RPM. Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

Question, what other mods were on the Fit when you dynoed?
 
  #47  
Old 09-28-2010, 05:45 PM
Staff@WR's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South San Francisco
Posts: 341
Just the SRI
 
  #48  
Old 09-28-2010, 06:02 PM
Lyon[Nightroad]'s Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Cackalacky
Posts: 1,827
After all the trouble it took to find a shop that could even do the balloon fittings properly and still have it leak I'm changing my tune. Save your time and get the WR one. Heck I'm probably going to end up getting one.
 
  #49  
Old 09-28-2010, 06:16 PM
blackndecker's Avatar
Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 1,316
^You can haz PM...
 
  #50  
Old 09-28-2010, 07:22 PM
555sexydrive's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: ATL, Jorja
Posts: 2,317
The underfloor cat is secondary and only exists to help clean up the exhaust a little bit further. With the 2nd sensor existing before the actual cat, the ECU is not going to see whether the secondary cat is there or not. Reason why I ordered the J's front pipe to mate up with the rest of the J's exhaust.

I'm no tree-hugging hippie, but I would rather not pollute the air too much, already there is enough out and about that is not regulated filling the air with crap, that at least having the primary cat will still produce a much cleaner exhaust than some vehicles on the roads...or did the CFC program take all of them off the road and put people into Fits? hahahaha
 
  #51  
Old 09-29-2010, 01:41 AM
j1nNju1c3's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 1,497
JDP Cf hood then this...
 
  #52  
Old 09-29-2010, 03:58 AM
Lyon[Nightroad]'s Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2009
Location: North Cackalacky
Posts: 1,827
Could you give a bit more info on the dyno? Was the first run also done with the SRI? Is that bhp or whp? (it says flywheel but that seems low for bhp). Thanks!
 
  #53  
Old 09-29-2010, 01:18 PM
Staff@WR's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
Join Date: May 2006
Location: South San Francisco
Posts: 341
both had the SRI on for the dyno and this is correct whp
 
  #54  
Old 09-29-2010, 05:04 PM
j1nNju1c3's Avatar
Member
5 Year Member
iTrader: (2)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: San Diego CA
Posts: 1,497
ooops......
 

Last edited by j1nNju1c3; 04-10-2011 at 02:14 PM.
  #55  
Old 09-01-2014, 11:44 PM
pmt666's Avatar
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Montréal, QC
Posts: 56
Originally Posted by Staff@WR
Ok here you all go I didnt know this thread was created. Anyhow here is the dyno result when we got our final version. The dyno is OEM vs WR Header both of which are going through the stock cat back exhaust system. We do not have a check engine light because of our CEL Eliminator.

Is it still available for the 2013 ? I understand there won't be any CEL issue with your kit (purchased separately).
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Vamprie Nong
2nd Generation (GE 08-13)
0
11-13-2018 12:53 AM
GE8FTW
2nd Generation GE8 Specific For Sale/WTB Used Parts Sub-Forum
7
10-03-2015 12:04 AM
dantei136
Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning
3
03-04-2014 10:32 PM
dantei136
Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning
4
03-04-2014 07:24 AM
siccmonkey
Fit Engine Modifications, Motor Swaps, ECU Tuning
21
02-29-2012 01:28 AM



Quick Reply: who has the weapon r header ge8



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:58 AM.